|تعداد مشاهده مقاله||7,632,783|
|تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله||5,853,913|
Studying the adding of sheep and cows rumen liquid to drinking water as a probiotic and its effect on productive traits and economic indicator of meat broiler
|Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences|
|دوره 20، شماره 2، تیر 2022، صفحه 275-281 اصل مقاله (680.98 K)|
|نوع مقاله: Research Paper|
|شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22124/cjes.2022.5557|
|J. Ismael Murtadha؛ Ali J. Hammod*|
|Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kufa, Najaf, Iraq|
|Current study was conducted in the poultry field of the Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kufa to determine the effect of adding sheep and cows rumen liquids to drinking water as a biological promoter and its effects on productive traits and economic indicator of meat broiler. 240 of one-day-old meat chicks (c.v Ross 308), sex unspecified with initial weight of 45 g were used. Chicks were raised for 35 days in closed hall divided into coops, 3 m2 in surface area for each and distributed randomly in four treatments with three replicates for each treatment (20 chicks for each replicate). Treatments were as follows: T1 (control without adding rumen liquid), T2 (adding 1 mL L-1 sheep rumen liquid to drinking water), T3 (adding 1 mL L-1 cow’s rumen liquid to drinking water) and T4 (adding 0.5 mL L-1 sheep and cow rumen liquids to drinking water). Chicks were fed with rennet (starter) from the first day for 10 days and fed with grower from the 11th to 24th days then with finisher diet from 25th to 35th days. Results showed that adding sheep and cow rumen liquids together to the diet of broiler was gave the best outcome for the final live body weight, final weight gain, improving feed conversion rate and economic indicator. Most studied traits were not significantly differ when adding cow’s rumen liquid to drinking water alone, also all experimental treatments were not significantly differ for the total consumed feed and dressing percentage. Adding the sheep and cow rumen liquids together had positive impact on some productive traits and enhanced the economic indicator of meat broiler.|
|Rumen liquid؛ Dressing percentage؛ Biological promoter؛ Live weight؛ Economic indicator|
Abd El Hakim, AS, Cherian, G & Ali, MN 2009, Use of organic acids, herbs and their combination to improve the utilization of commercial low protein broiler diets. International Journal of Poultry Science, 8: 14-20.
Abdulwahid, AS 2017, Effect of adding probiotic (Bio SB-Gold) to the dietary on some productive performance and carcass cut of broiler chickens. Euphrates Journal of Agriculture Science, 9: 744-751.
Al Mashhadani, HA & Taoma, BJJ 2014, Effect of using different levels of wheat bran fermented with rumen sheep content in diets on productive performance broiler chickens. Iraqi Journal of Poultry Sciences, 8: 25-41.
Al Qaysi, GA, Al Kaledy, RA & Najy, SA 2006, The comparative effect of imported (Biomin) and local Iraqi probiotic on broiler performance. The Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 30: 12-24.
Ali, NA, Jamieel, Y & Abbas, RJ 2019, Effect of dietary prebiotics (SafMannan) and local Iraqi prebiotic on some biochemical parameters of broiler chickens. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10: 1-6.
Areaaer, AH, Almrsomi, TS & Hammod, AJ 2020, Effect of fasting and early feeding by using hydro-gel 95 after hatching on the growth parameters of broiler chicks. Scientific Journal of King Faisal University, 1-7.
Beigh, YA, Ganai, AM & Ahmed, HA 2017, Prospects of complete feed system in ruminant feeding: A review. Veterinary World, 10: 424-437.
Duncan, BD 1955, Multiple range and multiple F. tests., Biometrics, 11: 1-42.
Esonu, BO, Azubuike, JC, Udedibie, ABI, Emenalom, OO, Iwuji, TC & Odoemenam, V 2011, Evaluation of the nutritive value of mixture of fermented bovine blood and rumen digesta for broiler finisher. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 1: 1–8.
Falaki, M, Shargh, MS, Dastar, B & Zarehdaran, S 2011, Effects of different levels of probiotic and prebiotic on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10: 378-384.
Glade, MJ & Fist, MD 1988, Dietary yeast culture supplementation enhances urea recycling in the equine large intestine. Nutrition Reports International, 37: 11–17.
Gonzalez, ARC, Barraza, MEB, Viveros, JD & Martinez, AC 2014, Rumen microorganisms and fermentation. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria, 46: 349-361.
Hammod, AJ, Mohammed, AA & Jassim, J M 2018, The effect of replaced partial or complete fermented wheat by sacchromyces cerevisia probiotic and rumen liquid that treated with urea instead of corn on productive performance of broiler. Journal of Kerbala for Agricultural Sciences, 178-193.
Jin, LZ, Ho, YW, Abdullah, N & Jalaludin, S 2002, Digestive and bacterial enzyme activities in broilers fed diets supplemented with lactobacillus cultures. Poultry Science, 79: 886-891.
Kopecky, J, Hrncar, C & Weis, J 2012, Effect of organic acids supplement on performance of broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 45: 51-54.
Mahdi, AS 2020, Role of dietary dried red grape pomace with saccharomyces cerevisiae on some physiological and productive aspects in awassi male lambs. MSc. Dissertation. College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Baghdad, Republic of Iraq.
Manhob, MK, Al Fadhli, MK, Shukair, HK, Ahmed, MJ & Irheem, KI 2016, Effect of addition of probiotics to diets for different periods on the productive performance of broiler. Diyala Agriculture Sciences Journal, 8: 53-59.
Mohammed Redha, SI 2012, Comparative effect of Iraqi method (uropygium gland removal) and adding probiotic to the dietary and their effect together on productive performance of broiler chickens. Journal of Kerbala University, 10: 1-7.
Mohammed, AA, Jassim, J M & Hammod, AJ 2016, The effect of replaced partial or complete fermented wheat instead of corn on productive and economic performance of broiler chicks. Kufa Journal for Agricultural Science, 8: 193-216.
Naji, SA, Rasule, BS, Al Ganabi, HK & Al Kazaze, MF 2010, Preparation of Iraqi probiotic and compared its effect with foreign probiotic on productive performance of broiler. Iraqi Poultry Sciences Journal, 5: 44-56.
Naji, SA, Rasule, BS, Al Qaysi, GA, Al Kazaze, MF & Al Ganabi, HK 2011, The probiotics in animal fields. 1st edition, Alnahrain for Printing and Publishing, Baghdad, Iraq. 99 p.
Ndams, SS, Tegbe, TSB & Ogundipe, SO 2009, Effects of feeding graded levels of re-fermented brewers dried grains on performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Journal of Agricultural Research, 1: 37-45.
Odefemi, TR 2016, Performance response and carcass characteristics of broilers fed dietary antibiotics, probiotics and prebiotics. European Journal of Forest Research, 4: 27-36.
Onu, PN, Otuma, MO, Odukwe, CA & Amiebo, AO 2011, Effects of different levels of broiler blood / rumen content mixture on productive performance, carcass characteristics and economical of production of finisher broiler. International Journal of Food, Agriculture & Veterinary Sciences, 1: 10-16.
SAS 2012, SAS/Statistics Users Guide: Statistics Cary. North Carolina, United States of America: SAS Institute Inc.
Taoma, BJJ 2014, Effect of using different levels of wheat bran fermented with rumen sheep content in diets on productive performance broiler chickens. Master thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Baghdad, Iraq.
Van Der Pol, C 2018, Access to water and feed in the heater increases chick heat production. Hatchtech, Gildetrom, Netherlands. Article Research, 25: 1-3.
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 480
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 629