پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 748 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,122 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 10,280,065 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,911,794 |
Response of sorghum to effect of two azo dye bacteria | ||
| Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences | ||
| دوره 19، شماره 2، تیر 2021، صفحه 251-260 اصل مقاله (1.02 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22124/cjes.2021.4742 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Alaa Jasim Mohammed Al-Shemmary* ؛ Maysoon Mahdi Salih Al-Taee | ||
| Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Babylon, Babil, Iraq | ||
| چکیده | ||
| A huge amount of azo-dye wastewater is generated annually by the textile industry. At present, the improper disposal of azo dyes to water bodies causes considerable concern as it can disrupt the ecosystem and, because of their toxicity and carcinogenicity, constitutes a possible environmental and health problem. Because of its cheap, environmentally safe, and sustainable properties, chemical, physical, and biological methods have been used to treat azo-dye wastewater, and biological technology has been recognized as a promising technique. Azo dyes are one of the most pollutant synthetic dyes to the environment. Azo dyes can be transmitted through a food chain and may be associated with problems of toxicity, carcinogenicity, and mutagenesis. In this study, contaminated soil with two Azo dyes, Reactive Blue (RB) and Reactive Red (RR) was used in sorghum planting (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) using different dye concentrations (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 g Kg-1 soil). Increased concentration of the dye caused significant alterations in the morphological characteristics of sorghum, such as steam length, leaves number and leaf area. There was a slight decrease in the plant content of total chlorophyll and carotenoids, while a significant variation in CAT and SOD enzyme activities was observed by increased dye concentration in the soil for both dyes compared to the control group. In addition, a significant increase in proline content was found at higher dye concentrations. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Antioxidant؛ Azo dyes؛ Benzidine؛ Carotene؛ Enzymes؛ Proline | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abd Ahmed, Y & Abood, NM 2016, Response of two varieties of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to plant density. Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14(2).
Agarwal, UP 2006, Raman imaging to investigate ultrastructure and composition of plant cell walls: distribution of lignin and cellulose in black spruce wood (Picea mariana). Planta, 224: 1141-1153.
Al-Rubaie, LAAR & Mhessn, RJ 2012. Synthesis and characterization of azo dye para red and new derivatives. E-Journal of Chemistry, 9: 465-470.
Al-Zurfi, SKL, Albdairi, NA & Almadany, SA 2020, Phytoremediation of congo red and brilliant green using lemna minor. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, pp.1-10.
Banimahd Keivani, M 2018, Removal of brilliant blue pollution from the environment using nano polyaniline hazelnut skin composite and evaluation of effective parameters. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 16: 249-258.
Bates, LS, Waldren, RP & Teare, ID 1973, Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39: 205-207.
Baughman, GL & Perenich, TA 1988, Fate of dyes in aquatic systems: I. Solubility and partitioning of some hydrophobic dyes and related compounds. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: An International Journal, 7: 183-199.
Benkhaya, S, M'rabet, S & El Harfi, A 2020. Classifications, properties, recent synthesis and applications of azo dyes. Heliyon, 6(1), p. e03271.
Carias, CC, Novais, JM & Martins-Dias, S 2008, Are Phragmites australis enzymes involved in the degradation of the textile azo dye acid orange 7? Bioresource Technology, 99: 243-251.
Chung, KT & Cerniglia, CE 1992, Mutagenicity of azo dyes: structure-activity relationships. Mutation Research/Reviews in Genetic Toxicology, 277: 201-220.
Chung, KT, Stevens, SE & Cerniglia, CE 1992, The reduction of azo dyes by the intestinal microflora. Critical Reviews in Microbiology, 18: 175-190.
Çinar, Ö & Demiröz, K 2010, Biodegradation of azo dyes in anaerobic–aerobic sequencing batch reactors. In: Biodegradation of Azo Dyes. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 59-72
Cisneros, RL, Espinoza, AG & Litter, MI 2002, Photodegradation of an azo dye of the textile industry. Chemosphere, 48: 393-399.
Clarke, EA & Anliker, R 1980, Organic dyes and pigments. In: Anthropogenic compounds. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 181-215
Collier, SW, Storm, JE & Bronaugh, RL 1993, Reduction of azo dyes during in vitro percutaneous absorption. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 118: 73-79.
Crespi, S, Simeth, NA & König, B 2019, Heteroaryl azo dyes as molecular photoswitches. Nature Reviews Chemistry, 3: 133-146.
Field, CB, Campbell, JE & Lobell, DB 2008, Biomass energy: the scale of the potential resource. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23: 65-72.
Fu, Y, Qin, L, Huang, D, Zeng, G, Lai, C, Li, B, He, J, Yi, H, Zhang, M, Cheng, M & Wen, X 2019, Chitosan functionalized activated coke for Au nanoparticles anchoring: Green synthesis and catalytic activities in hydrogenation of nitrophenols and azo dyes. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 255, p.117740.
Garg, VK & Kaushik, P 2006, Influence of short-term irrigation of textile mill wastewater on the growth of chickpea cultivars. Chemistry and Ecology, 22: 193-200.
Gunning, BE & Steer, MW 1975, Ultrastructure and the biology of plant cells. In: K, Arnold
Hunger (ed.), 2007, Industrial dyes: chemistry, properties, applications.
Kaushik, P, Garg, VK & Singh, B 2005, Effect of textile effluents on growth performance of wheat cultivars. Bioresource Technology, 96: 1189-1193.
Kholghi Eshkalak, S, Badii, K, Ahmadi, SH & Kholghi Eshkalak, A 2014, Biosorption of simulated aqueous solution containing acidic dyes by Azolla filliculoides. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 12: 15-29.
Kleinow, KM, Melancon, MJ & Lech, JJ 1987, Biotransformation and induction: implications for toxicity, bioaccumulation and monitoring of environmental xenobiotics in fish. Environmental Health Perspectives, 71: 105-119.
Lata, H, Garg, VK & Gupta, RK 2007, Removal of a basic dye from aqueous solution by adsorption using Parthenium hysterophorus: an agricultural waste. Dyes and Pigments, 74: 653-658.
Lichtenthaler, HK and Wellburn, AR 1983, Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents.
Limmer, M & Burken, J 2016, Phytovolatilization of organic contaminants. Environmental Science & Technology, 50: 6632-6643.
Lin, YH & Leu, JY 2008 Kinetics of reactive azo-dye decolorization by Pseudomonas luteola in a biological activated carbon process. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 39: 457-467.
Livingstone, DR 1998, The fate of organic xenobiotics in aquatic ecosystems: quantitative and qualitative differences in biotransformation by invertebrates and fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 120: 43-49.
Luhova, L, Lebeda, A, Hedererová, D and Pec, P 2003, Activities of amine oxidase, peroxidase and catalase in seedlings of Pisum sativum L. under different light conditions. Plant Soil and Environment, 49: 151-157.
Marklund, S & Marklund, G 1974, Involvement of the superoxide anion radical in the autoxidation of pyrogallol and a convenient assay for superoxide dismutase. European Journal of Biochemistry, 47: 469-474.
Movafeghi, A, Khataee, AR, Torbati, S, Zarei, M and Lisar, SS 2013, Bioremoval of CI Basic Red 46 as an azo dye from contaminated water by Lemna minor L.: modeling of key factor by neural network. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 32: 1082-1089.
Munné-Bosch, S & Alegre, L 2000, Changes in carotenoids, tocopherols and diterpenes during drought and recovery, and the biological significance of chlorophyll loss in Rosmarinus officinalis plants. Planta, 210: 925-931.
Mustafa, HM & Hayder, G 2020, Recent studies on applications of aquatic weed plants in phytoremediation of wastewater: A review article. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(1).
Nam, S & Renganathan, V 2000. Non-enzymatic reduction of azo dyes by NADH. Chemosphere, 40: 351-357.
Olah, GA, Reddy, VP, Prakash, GS & Friedel-Crafts Reactions, I 1994, ‘Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology’, Contact Lenses, John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ.
Oliveira, DP, Carneiro, PA Sakagami, MK, Zanoni, MVB & Umbuzeiro, GA 2007, Chemical characterization of a dye processing plant effluent-identification of the mutagenic components. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 626: 135-142.
Pandey, A, Singh, P & Iyengar, L 2007, Bacterial decolorization and degradation of azo dyes. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 59: 73-84.
Patade, VY, Bhargava, S & Suprasanna, P 2012, Effects of NaCl and iso-osmotic PEG stress on growth, osmolytes accumulation and antioxidant defense in cultured sugarcane cells. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 108: 279-286.
Pendleton, JW & Seif, RD 1961, Plant population and row spacing studies with brachytic 2 Dwarf Corn 1. Crop Science, 1: 433-435.
Raghda’a Ali Al-Khafajy, D, AL-Taey, KA and AL-Mohammed, MH 2020, The impact of water quality, bio fertilizers and selenium spraying on some vegetative and flowering growth parameters of Calendula officinalis L. under Salinity Stress. International Journal of Agricultural and Statistical Sciences, 16: 1175-1180.
Rajaguru, P, Fairbairn, LJ, Ashby, J, Willington, MA, Turner, S, Woolford, LA, Chinnasamy, N & Rafferty, JA 1999, Genotoxicity studies on the azo dye Direct Red 2 using the in vivo mouse bone marrow micronucleus test. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis, 444: 175-180.
Rehorek, A, Urbig, K, Meurer, R, Schäfer, C, Plum, A & Braun, G 2002, Monitoring of azo dye degradation processes in a bioreactor by on-line high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A, 949: 263-268.
Rejeb, KB, Abdelly, C & Savouré, A 2014, How reactive oxygen species and proline face stress together. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 80: 278-284.
Saibi, W, Feki, K, Mahmoud, RB & Brini, F 2015, Durum wheat dehydrin (DHN-5) confers salinity tolerance to transgenic Arabidopsis plants through the regulation of proline metabolism and ROS scavenging system. Planta, 242: 1187-1194.
Sandhya, S 2010, Biodegradation of azo dyes under anaerobic condition: role of azoreductase. In: Biodegradation of Azo Dyes, pp. 39-57.
Saquib, M & Muneer, M 2003, TiO2-mediated photocatalytic degradation of a triphenylmethane dye (gentian violet), in aqueous suspensions. Dyes and Pigments, 56: 37-49.
Tony, BD, Goyal, D & Khanna, S 2009, Decolorization of textile azo dyes by aerobic bacterial consortium. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 63: 462-469.
Vafaei, F, Movafeghi, A & Khataee, A 2013, Evaluation of antioxidant enzymes activities and identification of intermediate products during phytoremediation of an anionic dye (CI Acid Blue 92) by pennywort (Hydrocotyle vulgaris). Journal of Environmental Sciences, 25: 2214-2222.
Wong, PK & Yuen, PY 1996, Decolorization and biodegradation of methyl red by Klebsiella pneumoniae RS-13. Water Research, 30: 1736-1744.
Zhang, C, Yao, Feng, Liu, YW, Chang, HQ, Li, ZJ & Xue, JM 2017, Uptake and translocation of organic pollutants in plants: A review. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 16: 1659-1668.
Arekhi, M & Jamshidi, M 2018, Influences of inorganic binder on photocatalytic oxidation (PCO) and degradation of nano/micro TiO2 containing acrylic composites. Progress in Organic Coatings, 115: 1-8.
Zhou, X & Xiang, X 2013, Effect of different plants on azo-dye wastewater bio-decolorization. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 18: 540-546.
Zhuang, M, Sanganyado, E, Zhang, X, Xu, L, Zhu, J, Liu, W & Song, H 2020, Azo dye degrading bacteria tolerant to extreme conditions inhabit nearshore ecosystems: Optimization and degradation pathways. Journal of Environmental Management, 261: 110222. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 828 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 723 |
||