ساختار موضوعی افعال دومفعولی در کُردی هورامی

Anagnostopoulou, E. 2003. The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York. University College London, London, UK.

Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Gram­matical Function Changing, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Barss, A. & Lasnik. 1986. A Note on Anaphora and Double Objects. Linguistic Inquiry )17(: 347-354.

Bresnan, J. & T, Nikitina. 2007. The gradience of the dative alternation. Available at http://www.stanford.edu/%7Ebresnan/bresnan-nikitina. To appear in Reality exploration and discovery: Pattern interaction in language and life, (ed.) by L. Uyechi & L. Hee Wee. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Bruening, B. 2010. Double object Construction disguised as prepositional datives. Linguistic Inquiry, )41(: 287-305.

Cuervo, M. C. 2003. Datives at Large. Cambridge, MA: MIT Dissertation.

Den Dikken, M. 2006a. Phase extension: contours of the theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction. Ms. CUNY.

Fournier, D.H. 2010. La structure du prédicat verbal: une étude de la construction à double ob­jet en français, PhD Diss, University of Toronto.

Frank, R. 2007. Notes on phase extension. Theoretical Linguistics 33 (1): 49-64.

Georgala, E. 2012. Applicatives in their Structural and Thematic Function: A Minimalist Account of Multitransitivity. Doctorial Dissertation, Cornell University.

Harley, H. 2002. Possession and the double object construction. Yearbook of Linguistic Variation )2(: 29–68.

ــــــــــــ. 2012. Semantics in Distributed Morphology, In Claudia Maienborn, P. Portner & K. Heusinger (eds.), Semantics: International Handbook of Meaning, Vol. 3. Berlin: de Gruyter.

ــــــــــــــ. 2013. External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of voice and v. Lingua 125 (12): 159-217.

ــــــــــــــ. 2014. On the identiy o roots: Theoretical Linguistics. 4 (3/4): 225-276.

Heim, I. & A. Kratzer. 1998. Semantics in Genrative Grammar. Blackwell Publishers Ltd.

Hovav, R. & B, Levin. 2008. The English Dative Alternation: The Case for Verb Sensitivity, Journal of Linguistics )44(: 129-167.

Jackendoff, R. 1990. On Larson's treatment of the double object construction, Linguistic Inquiry 21(3): 427-456.

Jayaseelan, K. A. 2008. Topic, focus and adverb placement in cluse structure. Nanzan Linguistics (4): 43-68.

Karimi, Y. 2015. Remarks on ergativity and phase theory.  Studia Linguistica, 2015 /a-n/a. Online publication date: 1-Oct-2015.

Kratzer, A. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb, In: J. Rooryck and L. Zaring (eds.), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 109–137.

Larson, R. 1988. On the double object construction, Linguistic Inquiry )19:( 335-391.

ــــــــــــــ. 1990. Double objects revisited: Reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry )21(: 589–632.

Lee, J. 2005. A-movementLocality in Applicative Construction. U Pcnn Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 11,1.

Maienborn, Claudia. 2011. Semantics: An international handbook of    natural language meaning; Volume 1. Chapter: Event Semantics, Publisher: Mouton de Gruyter, Editors: Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner, P:802-829

Marantz, A. 2013. Verbal Argument Structure: Events and Participants, Lingua, )130(:152-168.

Ndayiragije, J. 1999. Checking Economy. Linguistic Inquiry (30): 399-444.

Paul, W. & J. Whitman. 2010. Applicative structure and Mandarin ditransitives. Argument Structure and Syntactic Relations, 261-282.

Pesetsky, D. 1995. Zero Syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Pylkkanen, L. 2008. Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Siddiqi, D. 2009. Syntax within the word: Economy, allomorphy, and argument selection in Distributed Morphology, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.