پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 778 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,449 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 19,591,479 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,520,586 |
Identification and Prioritization of Key Factors Affecting Workforce Productivity Using Grey Delphi and Grey DEMATEL: A Case Study | ||
| Computational Sciences and Engineering | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 4، شماره 1، تیر 2024، صفحه 13-30 اصل مقاله (691.67 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22124/cse.2025.30110.1097 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| Seyed Amin Badri* | ||
| University of Guilan | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Enhancing workforce productivity is a critical challenge for industrial and engineering companies. This study aims to identify and prioritize key factors influencing workforce productivity using a structured multi-criteria decision-making approach. Initially, the Grey Delphi Method was employed to gather expert opinions and determine the most influential criteria, leading to the identification of six main criteria and twenty-two sub-criteria. Subsequently, the Grey DEMATEL technique was applied with inputs from four decision-makers to analyze causal relationships and rank these factors. The results indicate that managerial factors had the highest impact on workforce productivity, followed by socio-psychological factors and economic factors. Among the sub-criteria, leadership style, job satisfaction, and alignment between personal interests and job roles were identified as the most critical. These findings provide valuable insights for managers and policymakers, highlighting the need for leadership development, employee engagement, and tailored motivational strategies to enhance productivity. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of integrating Grey Delphi and Grey DEMATEL in decision-making processes, offering a systematic approach to optimizing workforce performance in complex organizational environments. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Workforce Productivity؛ Grey Delphi؛ Grey DEMATEL؛ Decision-Making Methods؛ Applied Operations Research؛ Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. Sage Publications.
[2] Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage Publications.
[3] Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., & Wright, P. M. (2017). Fundamentals of human resource management (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
[4] Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
[5] Van Tam, N., Quoc Toan, N., Tuan Hai, D., & Le Dinh Quy, N. (2021). Critical factors affecting construction labor productivity: A comparison between perceptions of project managers and contractors. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1863303.
[6] Alzeraif, M., & Cheaitou, A. (2024). Factors influencing maintenance labor productivity in the electricity industry. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 15(6), 2141-2154.
[7] Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. World Publishing Company.
[8] Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Addison-Wesley.
[9] Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to "The social psychology of creativity." Westview Press.
[10] Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376-407.
[11] Hofstede, G. (1984). Cultural dimensions in management and planning. Asia Pacific journal of management, 1, 81-99.
[12] Hampden-Turner, C., & Trompenaars, F. (1997). Response to geert hofstede. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21(1), 149.
[13] Meyers, M. C., & Van Woerkom, M. (2014). The influence of underlying philosophies on talent management: Theory, implications for practice, and research agenda. Journal of World Business, 49(2), 192-203.
[14] Milkovich, G. T., & Newman, J. M. (2017). Compensation (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
[15] Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 267-299.
[16] Parker, S. K. (2014). Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annual review of psychology, 65(1), 661-691.
[17] Zhao, M., Lee, J. K. W., Kjellstrom, T., & Cai, W. (2021). Assessment of the economic impact of heat-related labor productivity loss: a systematic review. Climatic Change, 167(1), 22.
[18] Vischer, J. C. (2007). The effects of the physical environment on job performance: towards a theoretical model of workspace stress. Stress and health: Journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress, 23(3), 175-184.
[19] Dul, J., & Ceylan, C. (2014). The Impact of a creativity‐supporting work environment on a firm's product innovation performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1254-1267.
[20] Qi, K., Owusu, E. K., Siu, M. F. F., & Chan, P. C. A. (2024). A systematic review of construction labor productivity studies: Clustering and analysis through hierarchical latent dirichlet allocation. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 102896.
[21] Khan, S., Haleem, A., & Khan, M. I. (2022). A grey-based framework for circular supply chain management: a forward step towards sustainability. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(6), 1476-1501.
[22] Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management science, 9(3), 458-467.
[23] Faraji, H. (2024). Identifying and prioritizing effective factors on promoting human resource productivity in wood and paper industries of Mazandaran using MADM method (Master’s thesis). Iran University of Science and Technology.
[24] Singh, R., Khan, S., & Dsilva, J. (2023). A framework for assessment of critical factor for circular economy practice implementation. Journal of Modelling in Management, 18(5), 1476-1497. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 252 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 47 |
||