پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 748 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,122 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 10,275,435 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,911,091 |
Water saving role and environmental impacts of price liberalization in agriculture: An experience in Iran | ||
| Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences | ||
| دوره 22، شماره 4، دی 2024، صفحه 919-930 اصل مقاله (917.87 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22124/cjes.2024.8065 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Hamidreza Gerami1؛ Seyed Nematollah Moosavi* 1؛ Abbas Aminifard2 | ||
| 1Agricultural Economics and Natural Resources and Environment, Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht Branch, Marvdasht, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Economics, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Government intervention in the agricultural market, including guaranteed purchases and subsidy payments, has raised many environmental concerns due to the resulting pressure on and pollution of natural resources. In this study, the economic and environmental effects of price liberalization and reduction of government interventions in the agricultural products and inputs market were investigated in Shiraz City, Iran. For this purpose, five scenarios were designed, and a positive mathematical programming model with a cost function approach was used to assess their impacts. The results showed that the increased prices of agricultural products after eliminating dictated prices along with global prices enhanced the incentive to produce high-yield crops. There has been a 9.94% drop in farmers' net income due to the decrease in the total cultivated area of crops in the region. However, if this policy is accompanied by the elimination of agricultural input subsidies, the change in cropping patterns and elimination of cost-intensive crops from the pattern may result in 1.53% growth in profitability. The most important environmental impact of this policy was associated with water savings in agricultural use, which was estimated to equal 14.61%. Overall, it appears that changing in the cropping pattern after implementing the combined scenario increases profitability and reduces water consumption. However, this policy also results in a 3.95% increase in chemical fertilizer consumption in the region, which is a factor in environmental pollution. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Liberalization؛ Environment؛ Positive mathematical programming model؛ Input subsidy | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Akinbamowo, RO 2013, A review of government policy on agricultural mechanization in Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 5(8): 146-153. DOI: 10.5897/JAERD2013.0450
Allen, RG, Pereira, LS, Raes, D & Smith, M 1998, Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. FAO, Rome, 300(9), D05109.
Arfini, F & Paris, Q 1995, A positive mathematical programming model for regional analysis of agricultural policies. In: Proceedings of the 40th Seminar of the European Association of Agricultural Economists. Ancona, Italy, pp. 17-35.
Azik, F, Mousavi, SN & Najafi, B 2021, Economic-environmental analysis of Implementation of agricultural inputs subsidy reform policy in Iran: Application of computable general equilibrium model. Agricultural Economics and Development, 29: 43-71. DOI: 10.30490/aead.2021.351337.1252
Bakhshoodeh, M 2002, Predicting the effects of eliminating government interference from the wheat market. Agricultural Economics and Development, 9(35): 161-175.
Barnes, A, Sutherland, LA, Toma, L, Matthews, K & Thomson, S 2016, The effect of the common agricultural policy reforms on intentions towards food production: Evidence from livestock farmers. Land Use Policy, 50, 548-558.
Białowąs, T & Budzyńska, A 2022, The importance of global value chains in developing countries’ agricultural trade development. Sustainability, 14(3): 1389.
Boone, L, Dewulf, J, Ruysschaert, G, D’Hose, T, Muylle, H & Roldán-Ruiz, I 2019, Assessing the consequences of policy measures on long-term agricultural productivity–quantification for Flanders. Journal of Cleaner Production, 119: 121-154.
Brown, C, Kovacs, EK, Zinngrebe, Y, Albizua, A, Galanaki, A, Grammatikopoulou, I & Villamayor-Tomas, S 2019, Understanding farmer uptake of measures that support biodiversity and ecosystem services in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP): An EKLIPSE Expert Working Group Report. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford.
Cortignani, R & Dono, G 2018, Agricultural policy and climate change: An integrated assessment of the impacts on an agricultural area of Southern Italy. Environmental Science & Policy, 81: 26-35.
Darzi-Naftchali, A, Bagherian-Jelodar, M, Mashhadi-Kholerdi, F & Abdi-Moftikolaei, M 2020, Assessing socio-environmental sustainability at the level of irrigation and drainage network. Science of the Total Environment, 731: 138927.
Donohue, K G 2003, Freedom from want: American liberalism and the idea of the consumer. JHU Press.
Elahi, E, Khalid, Z, Weijun, C & Zhang, H 2020, The public policy of agricultural land allotment to agrarians and its impact on crop productivity in Punjab province of Pakistan. Land Use Policy, 90: 104324.
Garrone, M, Emmers, D, Olper, A & Swinnen, J 2019, Jobs and agricultural policy: Impact of the common agricultural policy on EU agricultural employment. Food Policy, 87, 101744.
Gholizade, H, Norouzi, G & Feizabadi, Y 2021, Investigation of the Effects of Government Macroeconomic Policies on the Development of Employment in the Agricultural Sector. Journal of Entreneurship and Agriculture, 7(14), 116-123.
Granvik, M, Lindberg, G, Stigzelius, KA, Fahlbeck, E & Surry, Y 2012, Prospects of multifunctional agriculture as a facilitator of sustainable rural development: Swedish experience of Pillar 2 of the common agricultural policy (CAP). Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 66: 155-166.
Hashemi, SZ, Darzi-Naftchali, A, Karandish, F, Ritzema, H & Solaimani, K 2022, Assessing agro-environmental sustainability of intensive agricultural systems. Science of the Total Environment, 831: 154994.
Heckelei, T 2002, Calibration and estimation of programming models for agricultural supply analysis. Habilitation Thesis, University of Bonn, Germany.
Heckelei, T & Britz, W 2000, Positive mathematical programming with multiple data points: A cross-sectional estimation procedure. Cahiers d'Economie et de Sociologie Rurales (CESR), 57(905-2016-70480): 27-50.
Helming, JF, Peeters, L & Veendendaal, PJJ 2001, Assessing the consequences of environmental policy scenarios in Flemish agriculture. Agricultural sector modelling and policy information systems, pp. 237-245.
Howitt, RE 1995, Positive mathematical programming. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77: 329-342.
Howitt, RE, Medellín-Azuara, J, MacEwan, D & Lund, JR 2012, Calibrating disaggregate economic models of agricultural production and water management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 38: 244-258.
Jamalimoghaddam, E, Yazdani, S, Salami, H & Peykani, G 2019, The impact of water supply on farming systems: A sustainability assessment. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17: 269-281.
Layani, G & Mehrjou, S 2023, Asymmetric effects of exchange rate and oil price changes on food and agricultural product prices in Iran: Application of NARDL approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics and Development, 37: 35-48, DOI: 10.22067/jead.2022.74721.1113
Layani, G, Bakhshoodeh, M & Zibaei, M 2021, Water resources sustainability under climate variability and population growth in Iran: A system dynamics approach. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 19: 441-455, DOI: 10.22124/cjes.2021.4931
Lencucha, R, Pal, NE, Appau, A, Thow, AM & Drope, J 2020, Government policy and agricultural production: a scoping review to inform research and policy on healthy agricultural commodities. Globalization and Health, 16: 1-15.
Mokgomo, MN, Chagwiza, C & Tshilowa, PF 2022, The impact of government agricultural development support on agricultural income, production and food security of beneficiary small-scale farmers in South Africa. Agriculture, 12(11): 1760.
Muñiz, IA & Hurlé, J B 2006, CAP MTR versus environmentally targeted agricultural policy in marginal arable areas: Impact analysis combining simulation and survey data. Agricultural Economics, 34: 303-313.
Negintaji, Z & Omidi kia, M 2014, The effect of banking facilities on macroeconomic variables of agriculture. Economic Modelling, 7(24): 71-87.
Noroozi, H, Hosseini, S & Ansari, V 2019, The Impact of Producers and Consumers Support Policies on Employment in the Agricultural Sector. Agricultural Economics and Development, 26: 187-214, DOI: 10.30490/aead.2019.85238
Noroozi, H, Hosseini, S & Ansari, V 2020, The effect of government support policies on investment in the agricultural sector of Iran. Agricultural Economics Research, 12(45): 45-68.
Olanipekun, IO, Olasehinde-Williams, GO & Alao, RO 2019, Agriculture and environmental degradation in Africa: The role of income. Science of the Total Environment, 692: 60-67.
Osabohien, R, Olurinola, I, Matthew, O & Ufua, DE 2022, Social protection intervention and agricultural participation in West Africa. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 14: 472-477.
Paris, Q & Howitt, RE 1998, An analysis of ill‐posed production problems using maximum entropy. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80: 124-138.
Pishbahar, E & Ferdowsi, R 2023, Identifying and ranking the problems of guaranteed purchase policy of agricultural products and alternative solutions. Agricultural Economics and Development, 30: 197-216. DOI: 10.30490/aead.2023.354850.1342
Pishbahar, E & Sani, F 2018, Evaluating the impact of guaranteed price policy in the barley: Using propensity score matching method (PSM). Agricultural Economics (Karaj), 12(1).
Pishro, H, Azizi, P & Azarkamad, R 2011, Agriculture products insurance assessment of Iran with sustainable agriculture approach. Territory, 8: 69-83.
Preckel, PV, Harrington, D & Dubman, R 2002, Primal/dual positive math programming: illustrated through an evaluation of the impacts of market resistance to genetically modified grains. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84: 679-690.
Shabanzadeh, M, Peykanei, G, Hoseini, SS & Yazdanei, S 2019, Change from the purchasing price policy to the guaranteed price policy and its effects on cropping pattern in Qazvin Plain. Journal of Agricultural Economics Researches, 11(1).
Shahnoushi, N 2014, Investigating the effects of implementing the targeted subsidies law on the chain of wheat, flour and bread. Research Project in Government Trading Corporation in Iran. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 96 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 179 |
||