حمایت افتراقی از متهمان آسیب‌پذیر در دادرسی کیفری (با نگاهی به قوانین اتحادیه اروپا)

Ashuri, Mohammad (2002), Criminal procedure, volume 1, 7th edition, Tehran: Samt Publications. [In Persian]

Ashuri, Mohammad (1997), Criminal Justice: A Collection of Articles, Tehran: Ganj Danesh Publications. [In Persian]

Farahbakhsh, Mojtabi (2006), “The Concept and fundamentals of the Accused's Defense Rights”, The Judicirys Law Journal, Volume 70, No. 56 and 57, pp. 111-136. [In Persian]

Gerry, Felicity and Penny Cooper (2017), Effective Participation of Vulnerable Accused Persons: Case Management, Court Adaptation and Rethinking Criminal Responsibility, jurnal of judicial administration, 26(4), pp. 265-274.

Haji Tabar Firouzjaei, Hassan (2011), “The Justifying Reasons of the Differential protection of vulnerable victims in the shadow of criminal sciences”, Private and Criminal Law Research (Encyclopedia of Law and Politics), Volume 7, No. 16, pp. 11-28. [In Persian]

Herring, J. (2016), “Defining Vulnerability” in Vulnerable Adults and the Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lore, Mergaerts Prof. Dr. Dirk Van Daele, Prof. Dr. Geert Vervaeke (2018), CHALLENGES IN DEFINING AND IDENTIFYING A SUSPECT’S VULNERABILITY IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS: WHAT’S IN A NAME AND WHO’S TO BLAME? Publisher: Wildy, Simmonds & Hill Publishing, pp. 48-71.

Khaleghi, Ali (2015), Criminal Procedure, Volume I, Tehran: Shahrdanesh Publications. [In Persian]

Mahdavi Far, Azam and Mojtabi Asgharian, Seyyed Mohammad Reza Naqibi (2019), “The Rights of Defendant Women in the Iranian legal System”, Women's Strategic Studies Quarterly, Volume 21, Number 84, pp. 115-132. [In Persian]

Mehra, Nasreen (2008), “The System of Criminal Law in England and Wales”, Journal of Islamic Law, Research Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought, Volume 4, Number 16, pp. 111-93. [In Persian]

Molazemian, Mohammad Masoud et al. (2023), “The Approach of Criminal Proceeding Systems of Iran, France and the United States to Contradiction Principle at Police Custody Stage”, Journal of Criminal Law Research, Volume 14, Number 1, pp. 221-248. [In Persian]

Nazerian, Hossein, Farjiha, Mohammad, Habibzadeh, Mohammad Jafar (2019), “Obstacles of Access to Justice for Women Accused of Sexual Offenses in light of the "Madonna- Whore" Theory”, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Studies, Volume 49, Number 1 , pp. 209-221. [In Persian]

Rahmat, Mohammadreza et al. (2019), “Differential Pre-Trial for Accused Patients”, Medical Law Journal, Volume 13, Number 50, pp. 109-132. [In Persian]

Rajabi, Ebrahim (2011), “Female police and the civil rights of women offenders and victims of crime, drugs and psychotropic”, Crime Prevention Studies, No. 21, pp. 135-158. [In Persian]

Shahed, Bahark and Nasreen Mehra (2018), “Some of the Characteristics of the due Process Model in the Criminal Procedure Act 1392”, Criminal Law and Criminology Research Journal, Shahr-e- Danesh Research Institute of Law, Volume 6, Number 12, pp. 5- 30. [In Persian]

Torabi, Mohammad et al. (2021), “Comparative study of the position of vulnerable groups from the perspective of the Alevi government with human rights and the international community”, Imam Ali’s studies, Institute For Humanities And Cultural Studies, Volume 12, Number 2, pp. 31- 67. [In Persian]

Van der AA, Suzan (2016), “Variable Vulnerabilities? Comparing the Rights of Adult Vulnerable Suspects and Vulnerable Victims under EU Law”, 7 New, Journal of European Criminal Law, pp. 1-19.

Zeraat, Abbas, Ahmadi, Anwar (2014), “The fundamentals and effects of the Presence of the Trial principle of the criminal proceedings”, Criminal Law Research Journal, University of Guilan (with the participation of the Iranian Association of Penal Law), Volume 5, Number 2, pp. 111-137. [In Persian]

Vots and Documents

Council Roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected or accused persons in criminal proceedings, [2009] OJ C295/1

Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) 2006

Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Right to Interpretation and Translation in Criminal Proceedings, Oct. 22, 2010, OJ 2010, L 280/1

Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Right to Information in Criminal Proceedings, May 22, 2012, OJ 2012, L 142/1.

Directive 2012/29 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA [2012] OJ L315/57.

Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Right of Access to a Lawyer in Criminal Proceedings and in European Arrest Warrant Proceedings, and on the Right to Have a Third Party Informed upon Deprivation of Liberty and to Communicate with Third Persons and with Consular Authorities while Deprived of Liberty, Oct. 22, 2013, OJ 2013, L 294/1.

Dittrich, 2008:92 Yogyakarta Principles

EU Victim Directive

Green Paper from the Commission on Procedural Safeguards for Suspects and Defendants in Criminal Proceedings throughout the European Union, Feb. 19, 2003, COM (2003) final, def.

Instance T. v UK (1999), ECtHR para 62, 84-89; V. v UK (1999), ECtHR para 86; S.C. v UK (2004), ECtHR para 28-29; Panovits v Cyprus (2008), ECtHR para 67; Plonka v Poland (2009), ECtHR para 38; Bortnik v Ukraine (2011), ECtHR para 43; Blokhin v Russia (2016), ECtHR para 194 and 199.

Panovits v. Cyprus (2009), ECtHR; Shabelnik v. Oekraïne (2009), ECtHR; Pishchalnikov v. Russia (2009), ECtHR; Dayanan v. Turkey (2010), ECtHR

Resolution of the Council of 30 November 2009 on a Roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected or accused persons in criminal proceedings ) OJ 2009, C 295/1)

Salduz v Turkey (2008), ECtHR para 54