پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 748 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,112 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 10,245,966 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,899,730 |
Sweet Maidens or Evil Witches? A Post-Jungian Study of Women’s Archetypal Images in Thomas Malory’s Le Morte d’Arthur and the Epic Part of Ferdowsi’s Shahnameh | ||
| نقد و نظریه ادبی | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 8، شماره 3 (ویژه نامه) - شماره پیاپی 17، اسفند 1402، صفحه 99-119 اصل مقاله (750.61 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22124/naqd.2024.26339.2546 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Helya Moaieri Farsi1؛ Mohammad Amin Sorahi* 2 | ||
| 1M.A. Student, Department of English Language, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of English Language, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Thomas Malory's Le Morte d’Arthur and the epic part of Ferdowsi's Shahnameh, addressing two key questions: how does Hillman’s concept of archetypal images illustrate the major images of women presented in Le Morte d’Arthur and Shahnameh? And, how are these images treated in their respective contexts? Using James Hillman’s Post-Jungian theory of archetypal images, which emphasizes preserving the individual details of the images, in contrast to Jungian archetypes that are reductionist and imprecise, this study explores the images of the women in Le Morte d’Arthur and Shahnameh both individually and in relation to one another. Based on a detailed examination of the unique characteristics of their images, collected from textual evidences, each of these women are categorized under the archetypal images of the daughter, the lover/wife, and the mother. The results of this study propose a comprehensive pattern, supported by various examples, for further detailed analyses of such archetypal images, as they open up new horizons for feminist studies by illuminating women’s multidimensional personalities. In addition, the major diversions from this pattern under the archetypal images of the sorceress and the warrior are discussed according to their respective contexts and societies as well. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Archetypal Image؛ Post-Jungian Analysis؛ Feminist Study؛ Arthurian Literature؛ Shahnameh | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Adams, M. V. (2008). “The Archetypal School.” P. Young-Eisendrath & T. Dawson (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Jung. New York: Cambridge University Press. 107-124. Alibaygi Sarhali, V. & A. Ramezani. (2022). “Psychological Critique of Shahnameh Women based on Jung’s Theory (Based on the Characters of Gordafarid, Katayoun and Tahmineh).” Journal of Persian Language & Literature, 244: 186-216. [In Persian]. Arzhangi, K. & V. Mobarak. (2015). “The Analysis of Witch Symbol in Shahnameh According to Jungian Psychology.” Quarterly Journal of Literary and Rhetorical Research, 12: 100-114. [In Persian]. Bassari, T. (1971). Zanan dar Shahnameh. Tehran: Daneshsara-ye Ali. [In Persian]. Berthelot, A. (1996). “From the Lake to the Fountain: Lancelot and the Fairy Lover.” T. S. Fenster (Eds.). Arthurian Women: A Casebook. New York: Garland Publishing. 153-170. Bromwich, R. (1961). “Celtic Dynastic Themes and the Breton Lays.” Estudes Celtiques, 9(2): 439-474. Bruce, C. W. (1999). The Arthurian Name Dictionary. New York: Garland Publishing. Carpenter, J. & S. MacLean. (Eds.). (1995). Power of the Weak: Studies on Medieval Women. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. Caughey, A. (2011). “Virginity, Sexuality, Repression and Return in the ‘Tale of the Sankgreal.’” D. Clark & K. McClune (Eds.), Arthurian Literature XXVII: Blood, Sex, Malory: Essays on the Morte Darthur. Suffolk: D. S. Brewer. 155- 180. Chrétien de Troyes. (1987). Chrétien de Troyes: Arthurian Romances. D. D. R. Owen (Eds. & Trans.). London and Melbourne: J. M. Dent. Davis, D. (2007). “Women in the Shahnameh: Exotics and Natives, Rebellious Legends, and Dutiful Histories.” In S. S. Poor & J. K. Schulman (Eds.), Women and Medieval Epic: Gender, Genre, and the Limits of Epic Masculinity. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 67-91. Evans, S. (Trans.). (1898). The High History of the Graal. 2 Vols. London: J. M. Dent. Fenster, T. S. (Eds.). (1996). Arthurian Women: A Casebook. New York: Garland Publishing. Ferdowsi, A. (2001). Shahnameh Ferdowsi. 2 Vols. Tehran: Karnameh-e Ketab. [In Persian]. Frazer, J. (1994). The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. Robert Fraser (Eds.). New York: Oxford University Press. Garry, J. & H. El-Shamy. (Eds.). (2005). Archetypes and Motifs in Folklore and Literature: A Handbook. New York: M. E. Sharpe. Hillman, J. (1973). “The Great Mother, Her Son, Her Hero, and the Puer.” P. Berry (Eds.), Fathers and Mothers. Putnam: Spring Publications. 166-209. Hillman, J. (1975). Re-Visioning Psychology. New York: Harper & Row. Hillman, J. (1977). “An Inquiry into Image.” J. Hillman (Eds.), Spring: An Annual of Archetypal Psychology and Jungian Thought. Putnam: Spring Publications. 62-88. Hillman, J. (1985). Anima: An Anatomy of Personified Notion. Putnam: Spring Publications. Hillman, J. (2004). Archetypal Psychology: A Brief Account. Putnam: Spring Publications. Howey, A. F. (2001). Rewriting the Women of Camelot: Arthurian Popular Fiction and Feminism. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. Khosravian, M. M. (2005). “Jadoo va Jadoogari dar Shahnameh Ferdowsi.” Ketab Mah-e Adabiat, 116: 45-54. [In Persian]. Krueger, R. L. (1993). Women Readers and the Ideology of Gender in Old French Verse Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lacy, N. J. (199). The New Arthurian Encyclopedia. New York: Garland Publishing. Lane, R. J. & J. Wurts. (1998). In Search of the Woman Warrior: Four Mythical Archetypes for Modern Women. Boston: Element. Lupack, A. & B. T. Lupack. (Eds.). (1999). Arthurian Literature by Women: An Anthology. New York: Garland Publishing. Malory, T. (1906). Le Morte d’Arthur. E.Rhys (Eds.). 2 Vols. London: J. M. Dent. Moore, T. & J. Hillman. (1989). The Essential James Hillman: A Blue Fire. London: Routledge. Otaño-Gracia, N. I. & D. Armenti. (2017). “Constructing Prejudice in the Middle Ages and the Repercussions of Racism Today.” Medieval Feminist Forum: A Journal of Gender and Sexuality, 53(1): 176-201. Rahmanian, E. & R. Ashrafzadeh. (2020). “Women in Shahnameh: An Overview on Mythical, Lyrical and Social Aspects.” Revista Humanidades, 10(1): 59-67. [In Persian]. Safa, Z. (1954). Hamase Soraii dar Iran. Tehran: Pirooz. [In Persian]. Samuels, A. (1985). Jung and the Post-Jungians. London: Routledge. Saunders, C. (2009). “Religion and Magic”. In E. Archibald & A. Putter (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Arthurian Legend. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 201-217. Seyed-Gohrab, A. A. (1999). “Magic in Classical Persian Amatory Literature”. Iranian Studies, 32(1): 71-97. Sharifian, M. & B. Atooni. (2013). “Phenomenology of Zaneh-Jadoo Based on Shahriyarnameh and Shahnameh.” Mytho-mystic Literature Journal, 32: 78-101. [In Persian]. Sklar, E. S. (1992). “Thoroughly Modern Morgan: Morgan le Fay in Twentieth-century Popular Arthuriana”. In S. K. Slocum (Eds.), Popular Arthurian Traditions. 24-35. Vines, A. N. (2011). Women’s Power in Late Medieval Romance. Suffolk: D. S. Brewer. Wehr, D. S. (1987). Jung and Feminism: Liberating Archetypes. London: Routledge. Wynne-Davies, M. (1996). Women and Arthurian Literature: Seizing the Sword. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Yahaghi, M. J. (2007). Farhang-e Asatir va Dastanvareha dar Adabiat-e Farsi. Tehran: Farhang-e Moaser. [In Persian]. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 204 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 136 |
||