پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 711 |
| تعداد مقالات | 6,695 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 9,270,481 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,374,017 |
Habitat Preference Assessment of Capoeta razii (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) in Klarood River, Mazandaran Province, Iran | ||
| Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences | ||
| دوره 22، شماره 2، تیر 2024، صفحه 267-275 اصل مقاله (1.18 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22124/cjes.2023.6829 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammadjavad Soleimanikutenaee1؛ Saber Vatandoust* 1؛ Hossein Mostafavi* 2؛ Reza Changizi1؛ Mojtaba Keshavarz3 | ||
| 1Department of Fisheries, Babol Branch, Islamic Azad University, Babol, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Bio-diversity and Ecosystem Management, Environmental Sciences Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Fisheries, Qaemshahr Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qaemshahr, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Habitat assessment is the most important step in environmental decisions. One of the ways to assess habitat quality is to use habitat suitability for fish species. So, this study was conducted in Klarood River, one of the important tributaries of Babolrood River in Mazandaran Province, north of Iran to evaluate the habitat quality for Capoeta razii. At first, a site with the least anthropogenic influences was selected on the river. Then the fish was caught by electrofishing device aggregate at 100 points. At each point where the fish was caught, environmental parameters such as depth, water velocity, type of biotic and abiotic substrate were also measured. The results showed that the species prefers water velocity of 16-30 cm s-1 and depth of 16-115 cm. Moreover, suitable abiotic and biotic substrates were Macrolithal, Mesolithal and Microlithal" as well as LPTP (Live parts of terrestrial plants) respectively. Generally, the results of this study showed the appropriate function of the model in assessing the habitat suitability of this species and it can be used as a guide for quantitative assessment of habitat as well as recognizing the behavioral characteristics of the studied species. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Habitat preference, Freshwater management؛ Ecology, Biodiversity conservation, Fish | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
AhmadiNedushan, B, St Hilaire, A, Bérubé, M, Robichaud, É, Thiémonge, N & Bobée, B 2006, A review of statistical methods for the evaluation of aquatic habitat suitability for instream flow assessment. River Research and Applications, 22: 503-523.
Bain, MB & Jia, H 2012, A habitat model for fish communities in large streams and small rivers. International Journal of Ecology, https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/962071.
Beecher, HA, Caldwell, BA & DeMond, SB 2002, Evaluation of depth and velocity preferences of juvenile coho salmon in Washington streams. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 22: 785-795.
Bovee, KD, Newcomb, TJ & Coon, TG 1994, Relations between habitat variability and population dynamics of bass in the Huron River, Michigan (Vol. 21). US Department of the Interior, National Biological Survey.
Dalkiran, N, Karacaogˇlu, D, Dere, Ş, Şentürk, E & Torunogˇlu, T 2006, Factors affecting the current status of a eutrophic shallow lake (Lake Uluabat, Turkey): Relationships between water physical and chemical variables. Chemistry and Ecology, 22: 279-298.
Fazli, H, Daryanabard, G, Naderi Jelodar, M, Mirzaei, R, Hosseinpour, H, Taleshian, H & Bagherzadeh, F 2018, Age determination and growth rate of Capoeta trutta in Azad Dam Lake, Kurdistan Province, Iran. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 16: 395-404
Gebrekiros, ST 2016, Factors affecting stream fish community composition and habitat suitability. Journal of Aquaculture and Marine Biology, 4: 00076.
Gilpin, ME, 1986. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, pp. 19-34.
Growns, I, Gehrke, PC, Astles, KL & Pollard, DA 2003, A comparison of fish assemblages associated with different riparian vegetation types in the Hawkesbury–Nepean River system. Fisheries Management and Ecology, 10: 209-220.
Hughes, RM, Kaufmann, PR, Herlihy, AT, Kincaid, TM, Reynolds, L & Larsen, DP 1998, A process for developing and evaluating indices of fish assemblage integrity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 55: 1618-1631.
Ivlev, VS 1976, 1961Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University-Press, New Haven, Conn, pp. 1-302.
Johnston, NT & Slaney, PA 1996, Fish Habitat Assessment Procedures (p. 102). Watershed Restoration Project, Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks and Ministry of Forests.
Kramer, DL 1983, The evolutionary ecology of respiratory mode in fishes: an analysis based on the costs of breathing. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 9: 145-158.
Maridet, L, Wasson, JG, Philippe, M, Amoros, C & Naiman, RJ 1998, Trophic structure of three streams with contrasting riparian vegetation and geomorphology. Archiv Für Hydrobiologie, 144: 61-85.
Melcher, AH & Schmutz, S 2010, The importance of structural features for spawning habitat of nase, Chondrostoma nasus (L.) and barbell, Barbus barbus (L.) in a pre-Alpine river. River Systems, 19: 33-42.
Mostafavi, H, Teimori, A, Schinegger, R & Schmutz, S 2019, A new fish based multi-metric assessment index for cold-water streams of the southern Caspian Sea Basin in Iran. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 102, pp.645-662.
Mostafavi, H, Schinegger, R, Melcher, A, Moder, K, Mielach, C & Schmutz, S 2015, A new fish-based multi-metric assessment index for cyprinid streams in the Iranian Caspian Sea Basin. Limnologica, 51: 37-52.
Oberdorff, T, Pont, D, Hugueny, B & Chessel, D, 2001, A probabilistic model characterizing fish assemblages of French rivers: a framework for environmental assessment. Freshwater Biology, 46: 399-415.
Parasiewicz, P 2007, The MesoHABSIM model revisited. River Research and Applications, 23: 893-903.
Pont, D, Hugueny, B & Oberdorff, T 2005, Modelling habitat requirement of European fishes: Do species have similar responses to local and regional environmental constraints?. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 62: 163-173.
Poppe, M, Stelzhammer, M, Seebacher, M, Muhar, S, Januschke, K, Lorenz, A, Kupilas, B, Hering, D 2012, Restoring rivers for effective catchment management. Deliverable 4.1 Field Protocols and Associated Database. European Commission, 110 p. Rosenfeld, J, Porter, M & Parkinson, E 2000, Habitat factors affecting the abundance and distribution of juvenile cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarki) and coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 57: 766-774.
Schmutz, S, Kaufmann, M, Vogel, B, Jungwirth, M & Muhar, S 2000, A multi-level concept for fish-based, river-type-specific assessment of ecological integrity. In: Assessing the ecological integrity of running waters: Proceedings of the International Conference, held in Vienna, Austria, 9–11 November 1998 (pp. 279-289). Springer, Netherlands.
Thurow, RF 1997, Habitat utilization and diel behavior of juvenile bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) at the onset of winter. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 6: 1-7.
Tilman, D, Fargione, J, Wolff, B, D'antonio, C, Dobson, A, Howarth, R, Schindler, D, Schlesinger, WH, Simberloff, D & Swackhamer, D 2001, Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science, 292: 281-284.
Vinagre, C, Fonseca, V, Cabral, H & Costa, MJ 2006, Habitat suitability index models for the juvenile soles, Solea solea and Solea senegalensis, in the Tagus estuary: defining variables for species management. Fisheries Research, 82: 140-149.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 146 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 237 |
||