پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 31 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 748 |
| تعداد مقالات | 7,112 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 10,246,114 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,899,807 |
Environmental impact assessment of compost plant (A case study: Baghdad City, Iraq) | ||
| Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences | ||
| دوره 21، شماره 1، فروردین 2023، صفحه 135-141 اصل مقاله (802.63 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22124/cjes.2023.6204 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Kuanysh Syman* 1؛ Khlood Abood2؛ Abed J. Kadhim3؛ Zahraa A. Al-Ajeeli4؛ Asal Faiz Hameed5؛ Zainab Al_hawraa Riyad Muedii6؛ Turasheva Svetlana7 | ||
| 1Institute of Natural Sciences and Geography, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, Almaty, Kazakhstan | ||
| 2Medical technical college, Al-Farahidi University, Baghdad, Iraq | ||
| 3Al-Nisour University College, Iraq | ||
| 4Department of Medical Laboratory Techniques, Al-Mustaqbal University College, 51001 Hillah, Babylon, Iraq | ||
| 5Department of Dentistry, AlNoor University College, Nineveh, Iraq | ||
| 6National University of Science and Technology, Dhi Qar, Iraq | ||
| 7Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Department of Biotechnology Almaty, Kazakhstan, Al-Farabi 71 Ave., 050045 Almaty, Kazakhstan | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Composting is one of the urban waste management techniques that aims to lessen the amount and weight of trash that needs to be removed, as well as the spread of flue and fat, resource recycling, and disposal costs. Composting facilities must have an environmental impact assessment (EIA) strategy in place in order to adhere to environmental laws and regulations within the context of the adaption of an environmental development plan. The environmental evaluation of the Baghdad composting plant was therefore utilized Leopold's modified matrix and checklist methodologies. At the outset of this study, the local ecosystem was examined. The effects of constructing the Baghdad compost plant on the environmental components were examined by dividing the construction and operation phases and selecting evaluation alternatives based on the properties and types of pollutants anticipated for the aforementioned facility. The three immediate, direct, and indirect effects, and the three-time intervals—short, medium, and long term—were all examined in this study. In this study, the Leopold matrix was expanded into a four-part matrix and evaluated separately from the importance and range of impacts in addition to taking into account how long the effects will last in the environment. The findings and accomplishments of this study have been examined and given in two options: project implementation without environmental considerations and project implementation with the use of techniques to lessen negative effects by separating the construction from the operational phases. The project's implementation was deemed unacceptable based on the predicted effects of the non-implementation option (-303). After minimizing the negative impacts, the implementation option was approved, producing the desired outcome (421). | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Compost؛ Environmental assessment؛ Leopold matrix | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbas, MD, Falih, AM & AL-Mutawki, KG 2020, A comparative study between municipal solid wastes management options in processing stage of Al-Diwaniyah city/Iraq. In: Vol. 1664. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, p. 012131.
Abdel-Shafy, HI & Mansour, MS 2018, Solid waste issue: Sources, composition, disposal, recycling, and valorization. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 27: 1275-1290.
Ahammed, R & Harvey, N 2004, Evaluation of environmental impact assessment procedures and practice in Bangladesh. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22: 63-78.
Al-Nasrawi, FA, Kareem, SL & Saleh, LA 2020, Using the Leopold Matrix Procedure to assess the environmental impact of pollution from drinking water projects in Karbala City, Iraq. In: Vol. 671. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, p. 012078.
Ayilara, MS, Olanrewaju, OS, Babalola, OO & Odeyemi, O 2020, Waste management through composting: Challenges and potentials. Sustainability, 12: 4456.
Babu, R, Veramendi, PMP & Rene, ER 2021, Strategies for resource recovery from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 3: 100098.
Bahrami, A, Schierning, G & Nielsch, K 2020, Waste recycling in thermoelectric materials. Advanced Energy Materials, 10: 1904159.
Bruhn-Tysk, S & Eklund, M 2002, Environmental impact assessment: A tool for sustainable development? A case study of biofuelled energy plants in Sweden. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22: 129-144.
Budovich, LS 2021, Effects of heavy metals in soil and plants on ecosystems and the economy. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 19(5):1009–1015.
Chew, KW, Chia, SR, Yen, H-W, Nomanbhay, S, Ho, Y-C & Show, PL 2019, Transformation of biomass waste into sustainable organic fertilizers. Sustainability, 11: 2266.
Cloern, JE, Abreu, PC, Carstensen, J, Chauvaud, L, Elmgren, R, Grall, J, Greening, H, Johansson, JOR, Kahru, M & Sherwood, ET 2016, Human activities and climate variability drive fast-paced change across the world’s estuarine–coastal ecosystems. Global Change Biology, 22: 513-529.
Eriksen, MK, Damgaard, A, Boldrin, A & Astrup, TF 2019, Quality assessment and circularity potential of recovery systems for household plastic waste. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23: 156-168.
Ginga, CP, Ongpeng, JMC & Daly, MKM 2020, Circular economy on construction and demolition waste: A literature review on material recovery and production. Materials, 13: 2970.
Heidari, EA, & Sadeghian, S, 2017, Zaveh cement plant environmental impact assessment using Iranian Leopold Matrix. Journal of Research in Environmental Health, 3: 84-93.
Hsu, E 2021, Cost-benefit analysis for recycling of agricultural wastes in Taiwan. Waste Management, 120: 424-432.
Huysman, S, Sala, S, Mancini, L, Ardente, F, Alvarenga, RA, De Meester, S, Mathieux, F & Dewulf, J 2015, Toward a systematized framework for resource efficiency indicators. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 95: 68-76.
Işıldar, A, van Hullebusch, ED, Lenz, M, Du Laing, G, Marra, A, Cesaro, A, Panda, S, Akcil, A, Kucuker, MA & Kuchta, K 2019, Biotechnological strategies for the recovery of valuable and critical raw materials from waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)–A review. Journal of hazardous materials, 362: 467-481.
John, G, Clements-Croome, D & Jeronimidis, G 2005, Sustainable building solutions: a review of lessons from the natural world. Building and Environment, 40: 319-328.
Khan, SAR, Sharif, A, Golpîra, H & Kumar, A 2019, A green ideology in Asian emerging economies: From environmental policy and sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 27: 1063-1075.
Lamprou, A & Vagiona, DG 2022, Towards a unified framework for project success score computation in construction projects. Civil Engineering, 3: 779-793.
Li, J, Liang, J, Zuo, J & Guo, H 2020, Environmental impact assessment of mobile recycling of demolition waste in Shenzhen, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 263:121371.
Lin, L, Xu, F, Ge, X, & Li, Y 2019, Biological treatment of organic materials for energy and nutrients production: Anaerobic digestion and composting. In: Vol. 4. Advances in Bioenergy. Elsevier, pp. 121-181.
Moharir, RV & Kumar, S 2019, Challenges associated with plastic waste disposal and allied microbial routes for its effective degradation: a comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208:65–76.
Priyanka, M & Dey, S 2018, Ruminal impaction due to plastic materials: An increasing threat to ruminants and its impact on human health in developing countries. Veterinary World, 11: 1307.
Rana, R, Ganguly, R & Gupta, AK 2019, Life-cycle assessment of municipal solid-waste management strategies in Tricity region of India. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 21: 606-623.
Read, QD, Brown, S, Cuéllar, AD, Finn, SM, Gephart, JA, Marston, LT, Meyer, E, Weitz, KA & Muth, MK 2020, Assessing the environmental impacts of halving food loss and waste along the food supply chain. Science of the Total Environment, 712: 136255.
Sk, MM, Ali, SA & Ahmad, A 2020, Optimal sanitary landfill site selection for solid waste disposal in Durgapur city using geographic information system and multi-criteria evaluation technique. KN-Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information, 70: 163-180.
Tavakoli, B, Alizadeh, O & Dorosti, F 2022, Integrated chemical coagulation with natural base coagulant–electro-proxone process and ultrafiltration membrane for treatment of compost leachate. Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences, 20: 203-216.
Um, N, Kang, Y-Y, Kim, K-H, Shin, S-K & Lee, Y 2018, Strategic environmental assessment for effective waste management in Korea: A review of the new policy framework. Waste Management, 82:129–138.
Wu, J, Chang, I-S, Wu, J & Chang, I-S 2020, Environmental Impact Assessment. Environmental Management in China: Policies and Institutions, pp. 35-62.
Yaqub, MT, Al-Bayati, AH & Rafiai, MA 2021, The Use of the Leopold Matrix in Environment Assessing for Some Construction Factories in Al-Anbar Governorate. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, pp. 11784-11789.
Zamparas, M, Kapsalis, VC, Kyriakopoulos, GL, Aravossis, KG, Kanteraki, AE, Vantarakis, A & Kalavrouziotis, IK 2019, Medical waste management and environmental assessment in the Rio University Hospital, Western Greece. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 13:100163.
| ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,589 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 849 |
||