تعداد نشریات | 31 |
تعداد شمارهها | 743 |
تعداد مقالات | 7,077 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 10,166,290 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 6,862,459 |
Investigating the impacts of technological innovation and renewable energy on environmental pollution in countries selected by the International Renewable Energy Agency: A quantile regression approach | ||
Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences | ||
مقاله 1، دوره 18، شماره 2، تیر 2020، صفحه 97-107 اصل مقاله (1.07 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22124/cjes.2020.4066 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
Nasim Masoudi؛ Nazar Dahmardeh Ghaleno* ؛ Marziyeh Esfandiari | ||
Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Iran | ||
چکیده | ||
Investigating the factors affecting CO2 emissions has always been a challenge. One problem with existing studies is that these studies have been relied on mean-based regression approaches, such as ordinary least squares (OLS) or instrumental variables, which implicitly assumes that the impact of variables along the distribution of CO2 emissions is the same. Unlike previous studies, the present study will use the quantile regression developed by Koenker & Bassett, which is not limited to the assumption. So that, the purpose of this study is to investigate the impacts of technological innovation and renewable energy on CO2 emissions in selected countries of the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) using quantile regression over the period 1990-2016. The results of this study exhibited that the impact of renewable energy on CO2 emissions was negative and statistically significant. This impact is also enhanced in high quantiles (countries with high pollution). In all the studied quantiles, the impact of technological innovations on CO2 emissions was positive, significant and initially decreasing, while increasing again over time. The results of the symmetry test also indicated that by increasing in the volume of CO2 emissions, the variable impact of renewable energy upraised. However, no incremental trend was observed in innovation. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
Technological innovation؛ Renewable energy؛ Environmental pollution؛ Quantile | ||
مراجع | ||
Adinehvand, Z 2016, The comparison about the effects of foreign direct investment, trade liberalization, economic growth on CO2 emissions: Selected OPEC member countries with Johansen's approach and error correction. MSc. dissertation, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, Iran, 97 p. [In Persian].
Torabi, T, Khajooi Pour, A, Tarighi, S, Pakravan, MR 2015, The impact of energy consumption, economic growth, and foreign trade on the emission of greenhouse gases in Iran, Journal of Economic Modeling, 1: 63-84. [In Persian].
Haghsheno, M, Ahoghalandari, M & Shaabani, Z 2008, "Investigating the impact of the emission of greenhouse gases on economic growth and how government policy is made in this field", Second Specialized Conference and Exhibition of Environmental Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran, 12 p. [In Persian].
Mehrabi Boshrabadi, H, Jalali Esfandabadi, SA, Baghestani, AA, Sharafatmand, H 2010, The impact of trade liberalization on environmental pollution in Iran, Iranian Journal of Economic Research and Agricultural Development, 2-42. [In Persian].
Abdouli, M 2016, Economic growth, FDI inflows and their impact on the environment: an empirical study for the MENA countries. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 51:1-26. [In Persian].
Alkhathlan, K, Javid, M 2013, Energy consumption, carbon emissions and economic growth in Saudi Arabia: an aggregate and disaggregate analysis. Energy Policy, 62: 1525–1532.
Al-Mulali, U, Ozturk I 2016, The investigation of environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in the advanced economies: The role of energy prices, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54: 1622-1631.
Ayres, RU & Nair, I 2008, Thermodynamics and economics. Physics Today, 37: 62- 71.
Berndt, E. R., & Wood, DO. (1975). Technology, prices and the derived demand for energy. Review of Economics and Statistics, No. 57, pp. 259-268.
Bilgili, F, Kocak, E, Bulut, U 2016, The Dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited environmental Kuznets Curve Approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 54: 838-845.
Binaysa, AC, Dogan, E, Seker, F 2014, “Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption-growth nexus: Evidence from a Panel Error Correction Model”. Energy Economics, 88: 5226-5230.
Boluk, G, Mert, M 2014, Fossil and renewable energy consumption, GHGs and economic growth: Evidence from a Panel of EU Countries, Energy, 74: 439-446.
Chamberlain, Gary 1994, “Quantile regression, censoring and the structure of wages,” In: Advances in econometrics, Ch. Sims, ed., New York: Elsevier, 171-209.
Cheng, LK, Dinopoulos, E 1990, "Economic growth in open economies" Schumpeterian growth and international business cycles, AER Papers and Proceedings, 1-10.
De, Jesus, A 2013, The Geothermal Story of the Philippines, Presented in Jakarta, Indonesia. http://www.slideshare.net/ djdevilles/the-geothermal-story-of-the-Philippines.40 p.
Dinda, S 2005, "A theoretical basis for the environmental Kuznets curve"; Ecological Economics. 53: 403– 413.
Dogan, E 2016, Analyzing the linkage between renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth by considering structural break in time-series data, Renewable Energy, 99: 1126-1136.
Fang, DB, Dong, B 2015, Prediction of China's carbon emission trend during thirteenth five-year development planning based GPR model. Technology Economics, 34: 106–113.
Halkos, O & Tzeremes, S 2009, Theoretical basis for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics 53: 403– 413.
Hung, M, Shaw, D 2000, Economic growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Taiwan: A Simultaneity Model Analysis,in:boldrin michele chen bee-lon,wang ding human capital , trade and public policy in rapidly growing economies: from theory to empirics, UK, Edward Elgar, 269-290.
Jebli, MB, Youssef, SB, Ozturk, I 2016, Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and trade in OECD countries, Ecological Indicators, 60: 824-831.
Jesus Lopez-Menendez, A, Perez, R, Moreno, B 2014, Environmental costs and renewable energy: Re-visiting the environmental Kuznets curve. Journal of Environmental Management, 145: 368-373.
Jones, A 2002, An environmental assessment of food supply chains: a case study on dessert Apples. Environmental Management, 30: 560-576.
Khoshnevis, Yazdi, S, Shakouri, F 2017, The renewable energy, CO2 emissions, and economic growth: VAR model, Journal of Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 23: 53-59. [In Persian].
Koenker, R 2005, Quantile regression for longitudinal data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91: 74-89.
Koenker, R & Bassett, Jr 1978, “Regression quantiles,” Econometrica, 46: 33-50.
Koenker, R, Hallock, K 2001, “Quantile Regression,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15: 143-156.
Koenker, R, Machado, F 1999, “Goodness of fit and related inference processes for quantile regression,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94: 1296-1310.
Kumar, S, Managi, S, Matsuda, A 2012, Stock prices of clean energy firms, oil and carbon markets: a vector autoregressive analysis. Energy Economics, 34: 215–226.
Lau, KM, Kim, KM, Sud, YC, Walker, GL 2010, A GCM study of the response of the atmospheric water cycle of West Africa and the Atlantic to Saharan dust radiative. Annales Geophysicae, 27: 4023-4037.
Lotz, R 2015, The impact of renewable energy consumption to economic growth: a panel data application, Energy Economics, 53: 58-63.
Mayer, R, Kent, J 2007, Energy consumption, economic growth and prices: a reassessment using panel VECM for developed and developing countries. Energy Policy, 35: 2481–2490.
Panayotou, T 1999, "Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development", Working Paper WP238 Technology and Employment Programed, Geneva: International Labor Organization, 42 p.
Pao, H-T, Tsai, C-M 2011, Multivariate Granger Causality between CO2 Emissions, Energy Consumption, FDI and GDP: Evidence from a Panel of Bric Countries, Energy, 36: 685-693.
Sadorsky, P 2010, The impact of financial development on energy consumption in emerging economies. Energy Policy, 38: 2528-2535.
Shenggang, R, Baolong, Y, Xie, M, Xiaohong, C 2014, International trade, FDI and embodied CO2 emissions: a case study of Chinas industrial sectors. China Economics Reviews, 28: 123–134.
Valeria, L 2006, The green economy and the BRICS countries: bringing them together. Economic Diplomacy Programme,1-17.
Wang, ZH, Yin, FC, Zhang, YX, Zhang, X .2012, An empirical research on the influencing factors of regional CO2 emissions: evidence from Beijing City, China. Applied Energy, 100: 227–284.
Yu, YDu, Y 2018, Impact of technological innovation on CO2 emissions and emissions trend prediction on ‘New Normal’ economy in China, Journal of Atmospheric Pollution Research, 23: 1-10.
Zhang, XP, Cheng, XM 2009, Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China. Ecological Economics, 68: 2706–2712.
Zang, S, Liu, Y, Lin, C, Nan, X 2017, A review of renewable energy investment in the BRICS countries: History, models, problems and solutions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 860-872. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,500 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,182 |