| تعداد نشریات | 32 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 840 |
| تعداد مقالات | 8,153 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 52,500,389 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 8,894,693 |
Indices of tolerance and sensitivity to water deficit stress in different cucumber genotypes. | ||
| Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، اصلاح شده برای چاپ، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 29 بهمن 1404 اصل مقاله (1.34 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22124/cjes.2026.9453 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammadreza Mohammadpour1؛ Jamalali Olfati1؛ Mohammadreza Khaledian* 2؛ Babak Rabiei3 | ||
| 1Department of Horticultural Sciences, University Campus, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran & Department of Water Engineering and Environment, Caspian Sea Basin Research Center, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Plant Production and Genetic Engineering, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| To identify genotypes tolerant to water stress and screen the tolerance and sensitivity indices to water stress, the present study was conducted in 2022 in the greenhouse of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran. The study included 50 cucumber genotypes in split plots and a completely randomized basic design with two levels of irrigation: full irrigation and deficit irrigation (50% of the water provided in full irrigation), each with three replications and two plants per replication. Based on the yield observed under both full and deficit irrigation conditions, various indices were calculated to assess tolerance and sensitivity to water stress. These indices included SSI, SI, HM, TOL, MP, YSI, GMP, STI, MRP, YI, REI, and SRI. The results of the mean comparison indicated that genotype 42 achieved the highest yield under full irrigation, while genotype 45 produced the highest yield under deficit irrigation. The highest values for MP, MRP, REI, STI, GMP, and HM indices were recorded in genotypes 45, 42, 43, and 22. The correlation test results also indicated that these six indices had the highest correlation with yield under both full and deficit irrigation conditions, making them the most suitable indices for screening and identifying superior genotypes. Using various methods in the present study, such as three-dimensional diagrams, principal component analysis, and cluster analysis, genotypes 45, 43, and 42 were identified as superior for achieving high yield under water scarcity conditions. Given Iran's water crisis and its exacerbation by climate change, breeding cucumber cultivars resistant to deficit irrigation is crucial for developing new hybrids suitable for the Iranian environment. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Breeding؛ Drip irrigation؛ Screening؛ Yield | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abbas, K, Li, J, Gong, B, Lu, Y, Wu, X, Lü, G & Gao, H 2023, Drought stress tolerance in vegetables: the functional role of structural features, key gene pathways, and exogenous hormones. International Journal of Molecular Science, 24(18):13876. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241813876.
Acosta-Gollegos, JA & Adams, MW 1991, Plant traits and yield stability of dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivar under drought stress. Journal of Agricultural Science of Cambridge, 117: 213-219.
Agricultural Statistics, 2022, Ministry of Agriculture. Iran [In Persian].
Allen, RG, Pereira, LS, Raes, D & smith, M 1998, Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements - FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, Rome, Italy.
Arab-Salmani, K, Jalali, A & Jafari, P 2023, Comparison of some morphophysiological characteristics and yield of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) hybrids. Journal of Horticultural Sciences, 37(4): 1190-1179 (In Persian).
Balkaya, A, Cankaya, S & Ozbakir, M 2011, Use of canonical correlation analysis for determination of relationships between plant characters and yield components in winter squash (Cucurbita maxima Duch.) populations. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 17(5): 606-614.
Bouslama, M & Schapaugh WT 1984, Stress tolerance in soybean. Part 1: evaluation of three screening techniques for heat and drought tolerance. Crop Science, 24: 933-937.
Cakir, R, Kanburoglu-Cebi, U, Altintas, S & Ozdemir, A 2017, Irrigation scheduling and water use efficiency of cucumber grown as a spring-summer cycle crop in solar greenhouse. Agricultural Water Management, 180: 78-87.
Clark, JM, Depauw, RM & Townley-Smith, TF 1992, Evaluation of methods for quantification of drought tolerance in wheat. Crop Science, 32: 723-728.
Dargahi, Y, Asghari, A, Shakarpour, M, Rasoul-Zadeh, A, Gharib-Eshghi, A & Shiri, M 2011, Evaluation of tolerance to water deficit stress in sesame cultivars based on tolerance indices. Agricultural Knowledge and Sustainable Production, 21(3): 119-133 [In Persian].
Das, A, Munshi, AD & Raju, D 2024, Key physiological traits for drought tolerance identified through phenotyping a large set of slicing cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) genotypes under field and water-stress conditions. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 71: 1-14. DOI: 10.1007/s10722-023-01737-y.
Eberhart, SA & Russell, WA 1966, Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6: 36-40.
Fernandez, GCJ 1992, Effective selection criteria for assessing stress tolerance. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress. Aug. 13-18, Taiwan. pp. 257-270. DOI: 10.22001/wvc.72511.
Fischer RA & Maurer R 1978, Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield response. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 29: 897-912.
Finlay, KW & Wilkinson, GN 1963, The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding program. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14: 742-754.
Francis, TR & Kannenberg, GN 1978, Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I: A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 58: 1029-1034.
Gavuzzi, P, Rizza, F, Palumbo, M, Campaline, RG, Ricciardi, GL & Borghi B 1997, Evaluation of field and laboratory predictors of drought and heat tolerance in winter cereals. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 77: 523-531.
Hossain, ABS, Sears, AG, Cox, TS & Paulsen, GM 1999, Desiccation tolerance and its relationship to assimilate partitioning in winter wheat. Journal of Crop Science, 30: 622-627.
Jafari-Rad, S, Zavareh, M, Khaledian, M & Rezaei, M 2015, Evaluation of tolerance of different rice genotypes to irrigation water salinity. Production and Processing of Crops and Horticulture, 5(17): 1-12 (In Persian).
Jobson, J 2012, Applied multivariate data analysis: volume II: Categorical and multivariate methods, Springer Science & Business Media, 732 p.
Lan, J 1998, Comparison of evaluating methods for agronomic drought resistance in crops. Acta Agriculturae Borrali-Occidentalis Sinica, 7: 85-87.
Lin, CS & Binns, MR 1989, Comparison of unpredictable environmental variation generated by year and by seeding-time factors for measuring type 4 stability. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 78: 61-64.
Liu, H, Yin, C, Gao, Z & Hou, L 2021, Evaluation of cucumber yield, economic benefit and water productivity under different soil matric potentials in solar greenhouses in North China. Agricultural Water Management, 243: 106442.
Mahdavi, A, Sorkhilallehloo, B, Ahmadi, S & Zare-Manesh, H 2012, Evaluation of drought tolerance in barley genotypes using stress tolerance indices. Agronomic Research, 4(2): 121-133 (In Persian).
Mirhosseyni, A, Hassanpour Asil, M, Olfati, JA & Farhangi, MB 2024, Genotypic variation in nitrogen use efficiency trait in 35 cucumber inbred lines. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 46(10): 1-12.
Moghadam, A 2018, Guide to cucumber cultivation: with emphasis on methods to increase its quantitative and qualitative productivity. Marz Danesh Publications. 76 p., (In Persian).
Moradipour, F, Olfati, JA, Hamidoghli, Y, Sabouri, A & Zahedi, B 2016, General and specific combining ability and heterosis for yield in cucumber fresh market lines. International Journal of Vegetable Science, 23(1), 1-9.
Ndukauba, J, Nwofia, GE, Okocha, PI & Ene-Obong, EE 2015, Variability in egusi-melon genotypes (Citrullus lanatus [Thumb] Matsum and Nakai) in derived Savannah environment in South-Eastern Nigeria. International Journal of Plant Research, 5(1): 19-26.
Panghal, VPS, Bhatia, AK, Duhan, DS & Batra, VK 2016, Phenological development and production potential of parthenocarpic cucumber hybrids under polyhouse environment. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 73: 604-606.
Parkash, V, Singh, S, Deb, S, Ritchie, G & Wallace, W 2021, Effect of deficit irrigation on physiology, plant growth, and fruit yield of cucumber cultivars. Plant Stress, 1: 100004.
Parvathaneni, RK, Natesan, S, Devaraj, AA, Muthuraja, R, Venkatachalam, R, Subramani, AP & Laxmanan, P 2011, Fingerprinting in cucumber and melon (Cucumis spp.) genotypes using morphological and ISSR markers. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology, 14(1): 39-43.
Raghvendra, S, Kumarsingh, A, Sanjay, K, Singh, BK & Psingh, S 2011, Combining ability studies in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L). Vegetable Science, 38(1): 49- 52.
Romer, T 1954, Sind die ertagsreichen sorten ertagssicher? DGL-Kitt 32: 87-89, (with English Abstract).
Rosielle, AA & Hamblin J 1981, Theoretical aspect of selection for yield in stress and non- stress environment. Crop Science, 21: 943-946.
Shukla, GK 1972, Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype × environmental components of variability. Heredity, 29: 237-245.
Subramanian, A & Subbaraman, N 2010, Hierarchical cluster analysis of genetic diversity in maize germplasm. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 1(4): 431-436.
Tariku, S, Lakew, T, Bitew, M & Asfaw, M 2013, Genotype by environment interaction analysis of rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes evaluated in north western Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1: 10-16.
Wang, H 2021, Cucumber economic values and its cultivation and breeding. BoD – Books on Demand, 2021. 228 pages.
Wang, J, Zhang, L, Cao, Y, Qi, C, Li, S, Liu, L, Wang, G, Mao, A, Ren, S & Guo, YD 2018, CsATAF1 positively regulates drought stress tolerance by an ABA-dependent pathway and by promoting ROS scavenging in cucumber. Plant and Cell Physiology, 59(5): 930-945, DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcy030.
Wricke, G 1962, Uber eine methode zur refassung der okologischen streubretite in feldversuchen. Flazenzuecht 47: 92-96, (with English Abstract).
Zahravi, M 2009, Evaluation of genotypes of spontaneum barley (Hordeum spontaneum) in terms of drought tolerance indices. Seedling and Seed Breeding, 25(1): 533-549.
Zarandi, M, Ramezani, A & Mojardi, M 2014, Greenhouse plants (cucumber cultivation). Qotb Landscape Publications. Torbatheydarieh, Iran, 168 p., [In Persian].
Zhang, C, Pratap, AS, Natarajan, S, Pugalendhi, L, Kikuchi, S, Sassa, H & Koba, T 2012, Evaluation of morphological and molecular diversity among South Asian germplasms of Cucumis sativus and Cucumis melo. International Scholarly Research Notices. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 8 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 11 |
||