مروری بر روش‌های تجزیه پایداری در به‌نژادی گیاهی با تاکید بر غلات، 1- رویکردهای ناپارامتری و پارامتری تک‌متغیره

Abyar, S., Navabpour, S., Karimizadeh, R., Nasrollahnejad Ghomi, A. A., Kiani, G., & Gholizadeh, A. (2021). Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction and grain yield stability of different bread wheat genotypes using non-parametric methods. Cereal Research, 11(2), 89-104. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22124/cr.2021.20461.1687.##Achenef, G. (2022). Advancement of analytical models quantifying G × E interactions and stability analysis in multi-environment trial. International Journal of Research in Agricultural Sciences, 9(4), 103-120.##Akcura, M., Kaya, Y., Taner, S., & Ayranci, R. (2006). Parametric stability analysis for grain yield of durum wheat. Plant, Soil & Environment, 52, 254-261. doi: 10.17221/3438-PSE.##Alipour, H., Abdi, H., Rahimi, Y., & Bihamta, M. R. (2019). Investigating grain yield and yield stability of wheat cultivars introduced in Iran over the last half century. Cereal Research, 9(2), 157-167. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22124/c.2019.13311.1492.##Alizadeh, B., Rezaizad, A., Hamedani, M. Y., Shiresmaeili, G., Nasserghadimi, F., Khademhamzeh, H. R., & Gholizadeh, A. (2022). Genotype × environment interactions and simultaneous selection for high seed yield and stability in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus) multi-environment trials. Agricultural Research, 11(2), 185-196. doi: 10.1007/s40003-021-00565-9.##Amini, A., Vahabzadeh, M., Majidi, E., Afyouni, D., Tabatabaei, S. M. T., Saberi, M. H., Lotfi, A., & Ravari, S. Z. A. (2010). Grain yield stability and adaptability of bread wheat genotypes using different stability indices under salinity stress conditions. Seed & Plant Improvement Journal, 26(3), 397-411. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22092/spij.2017.111032.##Annicchiarico, P. (2002). Genotype × Environment Interactions: Challenges and Opportunities for Plant Breeding and Cultivar Recommendations. FAO Plant Production & Protection Paper No. 174. of Food & Agriculture Organization of the Unitrd Nations (FAO) Publications, Rome, Italy.##Baker, R. J. (1988). Tests for crossover genotype-environmental interactions. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 68(2), 405-410. doi: 10.4141/cjps88-051.##Barati, A., Zali, H., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Gholipour, A., Koohkan, S., Shahbazi Homounlo, K., Marzoghiyan, A., Jabari, M., Poodineh, O., & Kheirgo, M. (2022). Interaction effects of genotype × environment using path analysis and mixed models in barley superior lines. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 53(2), 177-191. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22059/IJFCS.2021.323545.654826.##Becker, H. C. (1981). Correlations among some statistical measures of phenotypic stability. Euphytica, 30, 835-840. doi: 10.1007/BF00038812.##Becker, H. C., & Leon, J. (1988). Stability analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding, 101(1), 1-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00261.x.##Boyko, A., & Kovalchuk, I. (2011). Genome instability and epigenetic modification-heritable responses to environmental stress. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 14(3), 260-266. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.003.##Breese, E. L., & Mather, K. (1960). The organisation of polygenic activity within a chromosome in Drosophila. Heredity, 14, 375-399. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1960.36.##Cooper, M., Rajatasereekul, S., Immark, S., Fukai, S., & Basnayake, J. (1999). Rainfed lowland rice breeding strategies for Northeast Thailand. I. Genotypic variation and genotype × environment interactions for grain yield. Field Crops Research, 64, 131-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00056-8.##Cooper, M., Technow, F., Messina, C., Gho, C., & Totir, L. R. (2016). Use of crop growth models with whole-genome prediction: Application to a maize multi-environment trial. Crop Science, 56, 2141-2156. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.08.0512.##Crossa, J. (1990). Statistical analysis of multilocation trials. Advances in Agronomy, 44, 55-85. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60818-4.##Crossa, J., Vargas, M., Van Eeuwijk, F. A., Jiang, C., Edmeades, G. O., & Hoisintong, D. (1999). Interpreting genotype × environment interaction in tropical maize using linked molecular markers and environmental covariables. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 99, 611-625. doi: 10.1007/s001220051276.##Crow, J. F. (1986). Basic Concepts in Population, Quantitative and Evolutionary Genetics. W. H. Freeman & Co., New York.##Dehghani, M. R., Farshadfar, E., & Karami, A. (2008). Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in variable environments. Euphytica, 159(3), 419-432. doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9629-1.##Denis, J. B., Gauch, H. G., Jr, Kang, M. S., Van Eeuwijk, F. A., & Zobel, R. W. (1996). Bibliography on genotype-by-environment interaction. In: Kang, M. S., & Gauch, H. G., Jr (Eds.). Genotype by Environment Interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp. 405-409.##Dia, M., Wehner, T. C., Hassell, R., Price, D. S., Boyhan, G. E., Olson, S., King, S., Davis, A. R., Tolla, G. E., Bernier, J., & Juarez, B. (2016). Value of locations for representing megaenvironments and for discriminating yield of watermelon in the US. Crop Science, 56(4), 1726-1735. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.11.0698.##Doolittle, D. P. (1987). Population Genetics: Basic Principles. Springer, New York.##Eberhart, S. T., & Russell, W. A. (1966). Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Science, 6(1), 36-40. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1966.0011183X000600010011x.##Eisemann, R. L., Cooper, M., & Woodruff, D. R. (1990). Beyond the analytical methodology, better interpretation and exploitation of GE interaction in plant breeding. In: Kang, M. S. (Ed.). Genotype-by-Environment Interaction and Plant Breeding. Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, pp. 108-117.##Farokhzadeh, S., Shahsavand Hassani, H., Mohammadi-Nejad, G., & Zinati, Z. (2022). Evaluation of grain yield stability of tritipyrum as a novel cereal in comparison with triticale lines and bread wheat varieties through univariate and multivariate parametric methods. PLoS ONE, 17(9), e0274588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274588.##Farshadfar, A. (2015). The interaction effect of genotype and environment in plant breeding. Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University Press, 531 p.##Farshadfar, E., Sabaghpour, S. H., & Zali, H. (2012). Comparison of parametric and non-parametric stability statistics for selecting stable chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes under diverse environments. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 6(3), 514-524.##Fernández-Paz, J., Cortés, A. J., Hernández-Varela, C. A., Mejía-de-Tafur, M. S., Rodriguez-Medina, C., & Baligar, V. C. (2021). Rootstock-mediated genetic variance in cadmium uptake by juvenile cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) genotypes, and its effect on growth and physiology. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 777842. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.777842.##Finlay, K. W., & Wilkinson, G. N. (1963). The analysis of adaptation in a plant-breeding programme. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 14(6), 742-754. doi: 10.1071/AR9630742.##Flores, F., Moreno, M., & Cubero, J. (1998). A comparison of univariate and multivariate methods to analyze G×E interaction. Field Crops Research, 56(3), 271-286. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00095-6.##Fox, P. N., Skovmand, B., Thompson, B. K., & Braun, H. J. (1990). Yield and adaptation of hexaploid spring triticale. Euphytica, 47(1), 57-64. doi: 10.1007/BF00040364.##Francis, T., & Kannenberg, L. (1978). Yield stability studies in short-season maize. I. A descriptive method for grouping genotypes. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 58(4), 1029-1034.  doi: 10.4141/cjps78-15.##Freeman, G. H., & Perkins, J. M. (1971). Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability VIII. Relations between genotypes grown in different environments and measures of these environments. Heredity, 27, 15-23. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1971.67.##Fripp, Y. J., & Caten, C. E. (1971). Genotype-environment interactions in Schizophyllum commune. I. Analysis and character. Heredity, 27, 393-407. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1971.103.##Gauch H. G. Jr, (1992). AMMI analysis on yield trials. In: Fox, P. N., & Hettel, G. P. (Eds.). Wheat Special Report No. 8: Management and Use of International Trial Data for Improving Breeding Efficiency. pp. 9-12. CIMMYT, Mexico.##Gupta, C., & Salgotra, R. K. (2022). Epigenetics and its role in affecting agronomical traits. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 925688. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.925688.##Handel, A. E., Ebers, G. C., & Ramagopalan, S. V. (2009). Epigenetics: molecular mechanisms and implications for disease. Trens in Molecular Medicine, 16(1), 7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2009.11.003.##Hanson, W. D. (1970). Genotypic stability. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 40, 226-231. doi: 10.1007/BF00285245.##Hashim, N., Rafii, M. Y., Oladosu, Y., Ismail, M. R., Ramli, A., Arolu, F., & Chukwu, S. (2021). Integrating multivariate and univariate statistical models to investigate genotype-environment interaction of advanced fragrant rice genotypes under rainfed condition. Sustainability, 13(8), 4555. doi: 10.3390/su13084555.##Hernandez, C. M., Crossa, J., & Castillo, A. (1993). The area under the function: an index for selecting desirable genotypes. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 87, 409-415. doi: 10.1007/BF00215085.##Holland, J. B., Nyquist, W. E., Cervantes-Martínez, C. T., & Janick, J. (2002). Estimating and interpreting heritability for plant breeding: An update. In: Janick, J. (Ed.). Plant Breeding Reviews. Vol. 22. pp. 9-112. doi: 10.1002/9780470650202.ch2.##Huehn, M. (1990a). Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability. Part I. Theory. Euphytica, 47, 189-194. doi: 10.1007/BF00036213.##Huehn, M. (1990b). Non-parametric measures of phenotypic stability: Part II. Application. Euphytica, 47, 195-201. doi: 10.1007/BF00024242.##Huehn, M. (1996). Non-parametric analysis of genotype × environment interactions by ranks. Genotype by environment interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. pp. 213-228.##Jalaluddin, M. D., & Harrison, S. A. (1993). Repeatability of stability statistics for grain yield in wheat. Crop Science, 33, 720-725. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300040017x.##Kakoulidou, I., Avramidou, E. V., Baránek, M., Brunel-Muguet, S., Farrona, S., Johannes, F., Kaiserli, E., Lieberman-Lazarovich, M., Martinelli, F., Mladenov, V., Testillano, P. S., Vassileva, V., & Maury, S. (2021). Epigenetics for crop improvement in times of global change. Biology, 10(8), 766.  doi: 10.3390/biology10080766.##Kang, M. S. (1988). A rank-sum method for selecting high-yielding, stable corn genotypes. Cereal Research Communications, 16(1/2), 113-115. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23782771.##Kang, M. S. (1993a). Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: Consequences for growers. Agronomy Journal, 85(3), 754-757. doi: 10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500030016x.##Kang, M. S. (1993b). Issues in GE interaction. In: Rao, V., Hanson, I. E., & Rajanaidu, N. (Eds.). Genotype-Environment Interaction Studies in Perennial Tree Crops. Palm Oil Research Institute of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. pp. 67-73.##Kang, M. S. (1997). Using genotype-by-environment interaction for crop cultivar development. In: Sparks, D. L. (Ed.). Advances in Agronomy. Vol. 62. Academic Press. pp. 199-252. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60569-6.##Kang, M. S. (2020). Genotype-environment interaction and stability analyses: An update. In: Kang, M. S. (Ed.). Quantitative Genetics, Genomics, and Plant Breeding. 2^nd Edition. CABI. pp. 140-161. doi: 10.1079/9781789240214.0140.##Kang, M. S., & Gauch, H. G., Jr. (1996). Genotype-by-Environment Interaction. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. doi: 10.1201/9780367802226.##Kang, M. S., & Miller, J. D. (1984). Genotype × environment interactions for cane and sugar yield and their implications in sugarcane breeding. Crop Science, 24(3), 435-440. doi: 10.31742/ISGPB.83.1.14.##Karimizadeh, R., Hosseinpour, T., Alt Jafarby, J., Shahbazi Homonlo, K., & Armion, M. (2021). Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction and determining grain yield stability of durum wheat genotypes in uniform regional yield trials in semi-warm rainfed areas. Plant Genetic Research, 7(2), 25-40. [In Persian]. doi: 10.52547/pgr.7.2.3.##Karimizadeh, R., Mohammadi, M., Sabaghnia, N., & Shefazadeh, M. K. (2012). Using Huehn’s nonparametric stability statistics to investigate genotype × environment interaction. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 40(1), 293-301. doi: 10.15835/nbha4017593.##Karimizadeh, R., Vaez, B., Hosseinpour, T., Mehrban, A., & Ghojagh, H. (2009). Study on correlation and repeatability of parametric and multivariate statistics of grain yield stability in rainfed barley. Journal of Crop Production & Processing, 13(48), 53-62. [In Persian]. dor: 20.1001.1.22518517.1388.13.48.5.0.##Kebede, G., Worku, W., Jifar, H., & Feyissa, F. (2023). Grain yield stability analysis using parametric and nonparametric statistics in oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes in Ethiopia. Grassland Research, 2(3), 182-196. doi: 10.1002/glr2.12056.##Khalili, M., & Pour-Aboughadareh, A. (2016). Parametric and non-parametric measures for evaluating yield stability and adaptability in barley doubled haploid lines. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology, 18(3), 789-803. dor: 20.1001.1.16807073.2016.18.3.20.2.##Lado, B., Barrios, P. G., Quincke, M., Silva, P., & Gutiérrez, L. (2016). Modeling genotype × environment interaction for genomic selection with unbalanced data from a wheat breeding program. Crop Science, 56, 2165-2179. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.04.0207.##Lin, C. S., & Binns, M. R. (1988a). A method of analyzing cultivar × location × year experiment: A new stability parameter. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 76, 425-430. doi: 10.1007/BF00265344.##Lin, C. S., & Binns, M. R. (1988b). A superiority measure of cultivar performance for cultivar × location data. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 68(1), 193-198. doi: 10.4141/cjps88-022.##Lin, C. S., & Binns, M. R. (1991). Genetic properties of four types of stability parameters. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 82, 505-509. doi: 10.1007/BF00588606.##Lin, C. S., & Binns, M. R. (1994). Concepts and methods for analyzing regional trial data for cultivar and location selection. In: Janick, J. (Ed.). Plant Breeding Reviews. Vol. 12. pp. 271-297. doi: 10.1002/9780470650493.ch10.##Lin, C. S., Binns, M. R., & Lefkovitch, L. P. (1986). Stability analysis: Where do we stand? Crop Science, 26(5), 894-900. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600050012x.##Macholdt, J., Piepho, H. P., & Honermeier, B. (2019). Mineral NPK and manure fertilisation affecting the yield stability of winter wheat: Results from a long-term field experiment. European Journal of Agronomy, 102, 14-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2018.11.003.##Mohammadi, R., & Amri, A. (2012). Analysis of genotype × environment interaction in rain-fed durum wheat of Iran using GGE-biplot and non-parametric methods. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 92, 757-770. doi: 10.4141/cjps2011-13.##Mooers, C. A. (1921). Agronomic placement of varieties. Agronomy Journal, 13(9), 579-586. doi: 10.2134/agronj1921.00021962001300090003x.##Moreno-Gonzalez, J., Crossa, J., & Cornelius, P. L. (2004). Genotype × environment interaction in multi-environment trials using shrinkage factors for AMMI models. Euphytica, 137, 119-127. 10.1023/B:EUPH.0000033841.05593.15.##Mortazavian, S. M., & Azizi-Nia, S. (2014). Nonparametric stability analysis in multi-environment trial of canola. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 19(1), pp. 108-117. 10.17557/tjfc.41390.##Moumeni, A., Mohaddesi, A., Amooughli-Tabari, M., Tavassoli-Larijani, F., & Khosravi, V. (2019). Stability analysis and genotype × environment interaction for grain yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) promising breeding lines. Iranian Journal of Crop Sciences, 20(4), 329-344. [In Persian]. dor:‎ 20.1001.1.15625540.1397.20.4.5.4.##Nassar, R., & Hühn, M. (1987). Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: Tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Biometrics, 43(1), 45-53. doi: 10.2307/2531947.##Nassar, R., Léon, J., & Hühn, M. (1994). Tests of significance for combined measures of plant stability and performance. Biometrical Journal, 36(1), 109-123. doi: 10.1002/bimj.4710360115.##Olivoto, T., Lúcio, A. D., da Silva, J. A., Marchioro, V. S., de Souza, V. Q., & Jost, E. (2019). Mean performance and stability in multi‐environment trials I: Combining features of AMMI and BLUP techniques. Agronomy Journal, 111(6), 2949-2960. doi: 10.2134/agronj2019.03.0204.##Pauli, D., Chapman, S. C., Bart, R., Topp, C. N., Lawrence-Dill, C. J., Poland, J., & Gore, M. A. (2016). The quest for understanding phenotypic variation via integrated approaches in the field environment. Plant Physiology, 172(2), 622-634. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00592.##Perkins, J. M., & Jinks, J. L. (1968). Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity, 23(3), 339-356. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1968.48.##Piepho, H. P., & Blancon, J. (2023). Extending Finlay–Wilkinson regression with environmental covariates. Plant Breeding, 142(5), 621-631. doi: 10.1111/pbr.13130.##Pinthus, M. J. (1973). Estimate of genotypic value: A proposed method. Euphytica, 22(1), 121-123. doi: 10.1007/BF00039055.##Plaisted, R. L. (1960). A shorter method for evaluating the ability of selections to yield consistently over locations. American Potato Journal, 37, 166-172. doi: 10.1007/BF02855271.##Plaisted, R. L., & Peterson, L. C. (1959). A technique for evaluating the ability of selections to yield consistently in different locations or seasons. American Potato Journal, 36, 381-385. doi: 10.1007/BF02852735.##Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Barati, A., Koohkan, S. A., Jabari, M., Marzoghian, A., Gholipoor, A., Shahbazi-Homonloo, K., Zali, H., Poodineh, O., & Kheirgo, M. (2022a). Dissection of genotype-by-environment interaction and yield stability analysis in barley using AMMI model and stability statistics. Bulletin of the National Research Centre, 46(1), 19. doi: 10.1186/s42269-022-00703-5.##Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Khalili, M., Poczai, P., & Olivoto, T. (2022b). Stability indices to deciphering genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) effect: An applicable review for use in plant breeding programs. Plants, 11(3), 414. doi: 10.3390/plants11030414.##Raiger, H. L., & Prabhakaran, V. T. (2001). A study on the performance of a few non-parametric stability measures using pearl-millet data. Indian Journal of Genetics & Plant Breeding, 61(1), 7-11.##Raiger, H. L., & Prabhakaran, V. T. (2000). A statistical comparison between non-parametric and parametric stability measures. Indian Journal of Genetics & Plant Breeding, 60(4), 417-432.##Reyes-Herrera, P. H., Muñoz-Baena, L., Velásquez-Zapata, V., Patiño, L., Delgado-Paz, O. A., Díaz-Diez, C. A., & Cortés, A. J. (2020). Inheritance of rootstock effects in avocado (Persea americana Mill.) cv. Hass. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11, 555071. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.555071.##Roemer, T. (1917). Sind die ertragsreichen Sorten ertragssicherer. Mitteilungen der DLG, 32, 87-89. [In German].##Roy, D. (2000). Plant breeding analysis and exploitation of variation. Alpha Science International, UK.##Sabaghnia, N., Karimizadeh, R., & Mohammadi, M. (2012). The use of corrected and uncorrected nonparametric stability measurements in durum wheat multi-environmental trials. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(3), 722-730. doi: 10.5424/sjar/2012103-384-11.##Schlichting, C. D. (1986). The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annual Reviews of Ecological Systematics, 17, 667-693. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.17.110186.003315.##Sharifi, P., Erfani, R., Mohadesi, A., Abbassian, A., Yousefi, M. M., Aminpanah, H., & Saeedi, M. (2020). Analysis of the stability of grain yield in some rice genotypes using parametric and non-parametric univariate methods. Crop Production, 13(3), 85-106. [In Persian]. doi: 10.22069/ejcp.2021.17883.2315.##Shukla, G. K. (1972). Some statistical aspects of partitioning genotype-environmental components of variability. Heredity, 29(2), 237-245. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1972.87.##Silvey, V. (1981). The contribution of new wheat, barley and oat varieties to increasing cereal yield in England and Wales 1947-78. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany, 15, 399-412.##Singh, M., & Ceccarelli, S. (1995). Estimation of heritability using varietal trials data from incomplete blocks. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 90, 142-145. doi: 10.1007/BF00221008.##Soroush, H. R., & Rabiei, B. (2009). Evaluation of yield stability of rice genotypes in different locations of Guilan province. Journal of Agricultural Knowledge, 18(4), 106-114. [In Persian].##Studinicki, M., Kang, M. S., Iwańska, M., Oleksiak, T., Wo´jcik-Grant, E., & Mądry, W. (2019). Consistency of yield ranking and adaptability patterns of winter wheat cultivars between multi-environmental trials and farmer surveys. Agronomy, 9(5), 245. doi: 10.3390/agronomy9050245.##Syukur, M., Sujiprihati, S., Yunianti, R., & Kusumah, D. A. (2011). Parametric stability analysis for yield of chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia, 39(1), 31-37. doi: 10.24831/jai.v39i1.13185.##Taherian, M., Bihamta, M. R., Peyghambari, S. A., Alizadeh, H., & Rasoulnia, A. (2019). Stability analysis and selection of salinity tolerant barley genotypes. Journal of Crop Breeding, 11(29), 93-103. doi: 10.29252/jcb.11.29.93.##Tai, G. C. C. (1971). Genotypic stability analysis and its application to potato regional trials. Crop Science, 11(2), 184-190. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100020006x.##Tarinejad, A. (2016). Investigating the compatibility of bread wheat genotypes using Eberhart-Russell, simultaneous selection, bi-plot and non-parametric ranking methods. Cereal Research, 6(4), 451-464. dor: 20.1001.1.22520163.1395.6.4.4.8.##Taudt, A., Tatche, M. C., & Johannes, F. (2016). Genetic sources of population epigenomic variation. Nature Reviews Genetics, 17, 319-332. doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.45.##Thennarasu, K. (1995). On certain non-parametric procedures for studying genotype-environment interactions and yield stability. Ph. D. Dissertation. PJ School IARI, New Delhi, India.##Tonosaki, K., Fujimoto, R., Dennis, E. S., Raboy, V., & Osabe, K. (2022). Will epigenetics be a key player in crop breeding? Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 958350. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.958350.##Vaezi, B., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Mehraban, A., Hossein-Pour, T., Mohammadi, R., Armion, M., & Dorri, M. (2018). The use of parametric and non-parametric measures for selecting stable and adapted barley lines. Archives of Agronomy & Soil Science, 64(5), 597-611. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2017.1369529.##Vaezi, B., Pour-Aboughadareh, A., Mohammadi, R., Mehraban, A., Hossein-Pour, T., Koohkan, E., Ghasemi, S., Moradkhani, H., & Siddique, A. H. M. (2019). Integrating different stability models to investigate genotype × environment interactions and identify stable and high-yielding barley genotypes. Euphytica, 215, 63. doi: 10.1007/s10681-019-2386-5.##van Eeuwijk, F. A., Bustos-Korts, D. V., & Malosetti, M. (2016). What should students in plant breeding know about the statistical aspects of genotype × environment interactions? Crop Science, 56(5), 2119-2140. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0375.##Witcombe, J. R., & Whittington, W. J. (1971). A study of the genotype-environment interaction shown by germinating seeds of Brassica napus. Heredity, 26, 397-411. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1971.51.##Wricke, G. (1962). Über eine Methode zur Erfassung der ökologischen Streubreite in Feldversuchen. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung, 47, 92-96. [In German].##Xu, Y. (2016). Envirotyping for deciphering environmental impacts on crop plants. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 129(4), 653-673. doi: 10.1007/s00122-016-2691-5.##Yan, W. (2016). Analysis and handling of G × E in a practical breeding program. Crop Science, 56(5), 2106-2118. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.06.0336.##Yan, W., & Kang, M. S. (2002). GGE Biplot Analysis: A Graphical Tool for Breeders, Geneticists, and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton. doi: 10.1201/9781420040371.##Yates, F., & Cochran, W. G. (1938). The analysis of groups of experiments. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 28(4), 556-580. doi: 10.1017/S0021859600050978.