ارزیابی عملکرد ماشین بردار پشتیبان با کرنل های مختلف در تجزیه ژنومی در سطوح مختلف واریانس غالبیت

Akbarpour, T., Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, N., & Shadparvar, A. A. (2021). Marker genotyping error effects on genomic predictions under different genetic architectures. Molecular Genetics and Genomics, 296, 79-89. doi: 10.1007/s00438-020-01728-z.

Aliloo, H., Pryce, J. E., González-Recio, O., Cocks, B. G., & Hayes, B. J. (2016). Accounting for dominance to improve genomic evaluations of dairy cows for fertility and milk production traits. Genetics Selection Evolution, 48, 1-11. doi: 10.1186/s12711-016-0186-0

Aliloo, H., Pryce, J. E., González-Recio, O., Cocks, B. G., Goddard, M. E., & Hayes, B. J. (2017). Including nonadditive genetic effects in mating programs to maximize dairy farm profitability. Journal of Dairy Science, 100(2), 1203-1222. doi: 10.3168/jds.2016-11261

Ansari, S., Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, N., & Shadparvar, A. A. (2024). Genomic predictions under different genetic architectures are impacted by mating designs. Veterinary and Animal Science, 25, 100373. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2024.100373

Atefi, A., Shadparvar, A. A., & Hossein-Zadeh, N. G. (2021). Accuracy of genomic evaluation considering the interaction effect between estimation method of marker effects, population structure, and genetic architecture of the trait. Animal Production Research, 10(2), 1-10. doi: 10.22124/ar.2021.16234.1520 [In Persian]

Blondel, M., Onogi, A., Iwata, H., & Ueda, N. (2015). A ranking approach to genomic selection. PloS One, 10(6), e0128570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128570

Boser, B. E., Guyon, I. M., & Vapnik, V. N. (1992). A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on Computational Learning Theory. Pp. 144-152. doi: 10.1145/130385.130401

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic. doi: 10.4324/9780203771587

Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-Vector Networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273-297. doi: 10.1007/BF00994018.

Crow, J. F. (2010). On epistasis: why it is unimportant in polygenic directional selection. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1544), 1241-1244. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0275

de los Campos, G., Naya, H., Gianola, D., Crossa, J., Legarra, A., Manfredi, E., Weigel, K., & Cotes, J. M. (2009). Predicting quantitative traits with regression models for dense molecular markers and pedigree. Genetics, 182(1), 375-385. doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.101501

Duenk, P., Calus, M. P., Wientjes, Y. C., & Bijma, P. (2017). Benefits of dominance over additive models for the estimation of average effects in the presence of dominance. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, 7(10), 3405-3414. doi: 10.1534/g3.117.300113

Esfandyari, H., & Sørensen, A. C. (2017). xbreed: an R package for genomic simulation of purebreds and crossbreds. In Book of Abstracts of the 68th Annual Meeting of the European Federation of Animal Science. Pp. 234-234. doi: 10.3920/9789086868599_313

Falconer, D. S., and McKay, T. (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Gianola, D., Fernando, R. L., & Stella, A. (2006). Genomic-assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures. Genetics, 173(3), 1761-1776. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.049510

Ghafouri-Kesbi, F., Rahimi-Mianji, G., Honarvar, M., & Nejati-Javaremi, A. (2016). Predictive ability of random forests, boosting, support vector machines and genomic best linear unbiased prediction in different scenarios of genomic evaluation. Animal Production Science, 57(2), 229-236. doi: 10.1071/AN15538

Goddard, M. E., & Hayes, B. J. (2007). Genomic selection. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 124(6), 323-330. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007. 00702.x

González-Recio, O., Rosa, G. J., & Gianola, D. (2014). Machine learning methods and predictive ability metrics for genome-wide prediction of complex traits. Livestock Science, 166, 217-231. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.05.036

Habier, D., Fernando, R. L., & Dekkers, J. (2007). The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics, 177(4), 2389-2397. doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.081190

Hastie, T. J., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009). The elements of statistical learning, 2^nd edition. Springer-Verlag, New York.

Hayes, B. J., Visscher, P. M., & Goddard, M. E. (2009). Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix. Genetics Research, 91(1), 47-60. doi: 10.1017/S0016672308009981

Henderson, C. R. (1976). A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics, 32(1), 69-83. doi: 10.2307/2529339

Hill, W. G. (2010). Understanding and using quantitative genetic variation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365(1537), 73-85. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0203

Hill, W. G., & Robertson, A. (1968). Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 38, 226-231. doi: 10.1007/BF01245622

Howard, R., Carriquiry, A. L., & Beavis, W. D. (2014). Parametric and nonparametric statistical methods for genomic selection of traits with additive and epistatic genetic architectures. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, 4(6), 1027-1046. doi: 10.1534/g3.114.010298

Karimi, M., Ghafouri-Kesbi, F., & Zamani, P. (2023). Investigating the impact of dominance genetic effects on the accuracy of genomic evaluation. Research on Animal Production. 14(1), 145-153. doi:10.61186/rap.14.39.145 [In Persian]

Kasnavi, S. A., Aminafshar, M., Shariati, M. M., Kashan, N. E. J., & Honarvar, M. (2018). The effect of kernel selection on genome wide prediction of discrete traits by Support Vector Machine. Gene Reports, 11, 279-282. doi: 10.1016/j.genrep.2018.04.006

Long, N., Gianola, D., Rosa, G. J., & Weigel, K. A. (2011). Application of support vector regression to genome-assisted prediction of quantitative traits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 123, 1065-1074. doi: 10.1007/s00122-011-1648-y

Mäki-Tanila, A. (2007). An overview on quantitative and genomic tools for utilising dominance genetic variation in improving animal production. Agricultural and Food Science, 16(2), 188-198. doi: 10.2137/145960607782219337

Meuwissen, T. H., Hayes, B. J., & Goddard, M. (2001). Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics, 157(4), 1819-1829. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819

Meyer, D., Dimitriadou, E., Hornik, K., Weingessel, A., Leisch, F., Chang, C. C., & Lin, C. C. (2019). e1071: misc functions of the department of statistics, probability theory group (formerly: E1071), TU Wien. Available at:  https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/e1071/e1071.pdf

Mohammadi, Y. (2019). Accuracy of genomic selection using models with additive effects for productive traits in Iranian Holstein cows. The second international conference and the third national conference on agriculture, environment and food security. Jiroft University, Jiroft, Iran. [In Persian]

Momen, M., Mehrgardi, A. A., Sheikhi, A., Kranis, A., Tusell, L., Morota, G., Rosa, G. J. M., & Gianola, D. (2018). Predictive ability of genome-assisted statistical models under various forms of gene action. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 12309. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30089-2

Neves, H. H., Carvalheiro, R., & Queiroz, S. A. (2012). A comparison of statistical methods for genomic selection in a mice population. BMC Genetics, 13, 1-17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-13-100

Nocedal, J., & Wright, S. J. (Eds.). (1999). Numerical optimization. New York, NY: Springer New York.                doi: 10.1007/0-387-22742-3_18

Ogutu, J. O., Piepho, H. P., & Schulz-Streeck, T. (2011). A comparison of random forests, boosting and support vector machines for genomic selection. BMC Proceedings,  5, 1-5. doi: 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S3-S11

Pérez, P., & de Los Campos, G. (2014). Genome-wide regression and prediction with the BGLR statistical package. Genetics, 198(2), 483-495. doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.164442

Quaas, R. L. (1976). Computing the diagonal elements and inverse of a large numerator relationship matrix. Biometrics, 32(4), 949-953. doi: 10.2307/2529279

Saheb Alam, H., Gholizadeh, M., Hafezian, H., & Farhadi, A. (2018). Comparison of Bayesian methods in the genomic evaluation with different genetic architecture. Research on Animal Production, 8(18), 177-186. doi: 10.29252/rap.8.18.177 [In Persian]

Sahebalam, H., Gholizadeh, M., Hafezian, H., & Farhadi, A. (2019). Comparison of parametric, semiparametric and nonparametric methods in genomic evaluation. Journal of Genetics, 98, 1-8. doi: 10.1007/s12041-019-1149-3

Sahebalam, H., Gholizadeh, M., Hafezian, H., & Ebrahimi, F. (2022). Evaluation of Bagging approach versus GBLUP and Bayesian LASSO in genomic prediction. Journal of Genetics, 101(1), 19. doi: 10.1007/s12041-022-01358-x

Sahebalam, H., Gholizadeh, M., & Hafezian, H. (2024). Investigating the performance of frequentist and Bayesian techniques in genomic evaluation. Biochemical Genetics, 1-27. doi: 10.1007/s10528-024-10842-1

Salehi, A., Bazrafshan, M., & Abdollahi-Arpanahi, R. (2021). Assessment of parametric and non-parametric methods for prediction of quantitative traits with non-additive genetic architecture. Annals of Animal Science, 21(2), 469-484. doi: 10.2478/aoas-2020-0087

Schölkopf, B. (2002). Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond.

Seyedsharifi, R., Ala Noshahr, F., Seif Davati, J., & Hedayat Evrigh, N. (2022). Genomic prediction of additive and dominance effects on some economic traits of Moghani sheep. Research on Animal Production. 13(38), 187-193. doi:10.52547/rap.13.38.187 [In Persian]

Shin, K. S., Lee, T. S., & Kim, H. J. (2005). An application of support vector machines in bankruptcy prediction model. Expert Systems with Applications, 28(1), 127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2004.08.009

Su, G., Christensen, O. F., Ostersen, T., Henryon, M., & Lund, M. S. (2012). Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers. PLoS One. 7, e45293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045293

Tamaddoni-Arani, M., Razmkabir, M., Abdollahi-Arpanahi, R., Rashidi, A., & Moradi, Z. (2021). Comparison of different statistical methods in genomic selection based on selection effectiveness criteria. Animal Production Research, 10(3), 1-20. doi: 10.22124/ar.2021.19332.1608 [In Persian]

Thomasen, J. R., Sørensen, A. C., Su, G., Madsen, P., Lund, M. S., & Guldbrandtsen, B. (2013). The admixed population structure in Danish Jersey dairy cattle challenges accurate genomic predictions. Journal of Animal Science, 91(7), 3105-3112. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5490

Toro, M. A., & Varona, L. (2010). A note on mate allocation for dominance handling in genomic selection. Genetics Selection Evolution, 42, 1-9. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-42-33

VanRaden, P. M. (2008). Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. Journal of Dairy Science, 91(11), 4414-4423. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0980

Vapnik, V. (1995). The nature of statistical learning theory. (2nd ed.). Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-3264-1

Varona, L., Legarra, A., Toro, M. A., & Vitezica, Z. G. (2018). Non-additive effects in genomic selection. Frontiers in Genetics, 9(78), 1-12. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00078

Vitezica, Z. G., Varona, L., & Legarra, A. (2013). On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope. Genetics, 195(4), 1223-1230. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.155176 

Yang, P., Hwa Yang, Y., Zhou, B. B., & Zomaya, A. Y. (2010). A review of ensemble methods in bioinformatics. Current Bioinformatics, 5(4), 296-308. doi: 10.2174/157489310794072508

Zeng, J., Toosi, A., Fernando, R. L., Dekkers, J. C., & Garrick, D. J. (2013). Genomic selection of purebred animals for crossbred performance in the presence of dominant gene action. Genetics Selection Evolution, 45, 1-17. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-45-11

Zhu, Y., Tan, Y., Hua, Y., Wang, M., Zhang, G., & Zhang, J. (2010). Feature selection and performance evaluation of support vector machine (SVM)-based classifier for differentiating benign and malignant pulmonary nodules by computed tomography. Journal of Digital Imaging, 23, 51-65. doi: 10.1007/s10278-009-9185-9