
تعداد نشریات | 31 |
تعداد شمارهها | 805 |
تعداد مقالات | 7,742 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 35,516,363 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 7,898,526 |
تبیین زمینه ها و الزامات حکمرانی جهانی | ||
سیاست جهانی | ||
مقاله 1، دوره 14، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 52، مرداد 1404، صفحه 7-31 اصل مقاله (1018.79 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22124/wp.2025.28820.3425 | ||
نویسنده | ||
علی خواجه نائینی* | ||
استادیار سیاستگذاری عمومی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی | ||
چکیده | ||
«استانداردها، هنجارها، ظرفیتهای دولتی و سازمانهای بینالمللی» همراه با «هماهنگی اقدامات، حل مشکلات فراملی و مدیریت تعارض» عناصر اصلی حکمرانی جهانی را تشکیل میدهند.جهانیشدن به عنوان وابستگی متقابل فزاینده بین کشورها و مردم در سراسر جهان، نیاز به حکمرانی جهانی را جهت تسهیل اقدامات مشارکتی در برابر مسائل زیستمحیطی، اقتصادی و سیاسی که ملل مختلف را تحت تأثیر قرار میدهد، تشدید کرده است. از همگسیختگی کارکردهای اساسی دولت، تکهتکه شدن هویتهای فرهنگی و پیکربندی مجدد فضاهای اجتماعی، اقتصادی و سیاسی از دیگر مسائلی است که ضرورت تدبیر برای برقراری حکمرانی جهانی را ایجاب میکند. پذیرش مفهوم حکمرانی جهانی و تلاش در جهت برقراری آن نیازمند زمینهها و الزاماتی است که این مقاله به آن میپردازد. تعیین نسبت میان نهادهای بین المللی و رژیمهای بین المللی با مفهوم حکمرانی جهانی و همچنین توافق بر مشروعیت سازوکارهای حکمرانی جهانی از جمله این موراد است. همچنین نقش شبکههای بازیگران دولتی و غیردولتی در سطوح ملی و فراملی و توسعه مفاهیمی مانند شهروندی جهانی از دیگر زمینههایی است که در ارتباط با حکمرانی جهانی در این مقاله مورد بررسی قرار میگیرد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
حکمرانی جهانی؛ شبکهها؛ شهروندی جهانی؛ مشروعیت | ||
مراجع | ||
Ball, S. J., & Junemann, C. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Policy Press.
Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (Eds.). (2005). Power in global governance. Cambridge University Press.
Barnett, M., & Duvall, R. (2009). Power in global governance. In M. Barnett & R. Duvall (Eds.), Power in global governance (pp. 1–32). Cambridge University Press.
Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Cornell University Press.
Beetham, D. (2013). The legitimation of power (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Benedic, K. (2015). Global governance. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. https://doi.org/10.1080/00963402.2015.1008548
Biermann, F., & Gupta, A. (2011). Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1856–1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.017
Bodansky, D. (2013). Legitimacy in international law and international relations. In J. L. Dunoff & M. A. Pollack (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on international law and international relations: The state of the art (pp. 321–341). Cambridge University Press.
Cabrera, L. (2010). World government: Renewed debate, persistent challenges. European Journal of International Relations, 16(3), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066109345054
Cadman, T. M. (2009). Quality, legitimacy and global governance: A comparative analysis of four forest institutions. Philosophy.
Castells, M. (2000). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Volume I: The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
Cerny, P. (2010). Rethinking world politics: A theory of transnational neopluralism. Oxford University Press.
Chumakov, A. N. (2013). Theory and practice of global governance: Topical issues. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 77, 198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.03.079
Deudney, D. (2007). Bounding power: Republican security theory from the polis to the global village. Princeton University Press.
Dimitrov, R. S. (2005). Hostage to norms: States, institutions and global forest politics. Global Environmental Politics, 5(4), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638005774785522
Drezner, D. W. (2009). The power and peril of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090082
Edwards, B., Jr. (2024). Hidden in plain sight: The foundations and limitations of global governance and global goals. International Journal of Educational Development, 106, 103013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103013
Fuchs, D. (2007). Business power in global governance. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Gorman, R. F. (2016). What’s wrong with global governance. Acton Institute.
Gehring, T. (1994). Dynamic international regimes: Institutions for international environmental governance. Peter Lang.
Giessen, L. (2018). The two faces of international land use governance: Customizing the international forest regime complex and its domestic consequences on forest policies through bureaucratic politics (Habilitation dissertation). Georg-August-Universität Göttingen.
Haas, P. M., Keohane, R. O., & Levy, M. A. (Eds.). (1993). Institutions for the Earth. MIT Press.
Haggart, B., & Keller, C. I. (2021). Democratic legitimacy in global platform governance. Telecommunications Policy, 45(6), 102152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102152
Hillman, K., Nilsson, M., Rickne, A., & Magnusson, T. (2011). Fostering sustainable technologies: A framework for analysing the governance of innovation systems. Science and Public Policy, 38(6), 403–415. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X12960315267665
Hirst, P., & Thompson, G. (1999). Globalisation in question (2nd ed.). Polity Press.
Hurrell, A. (2007). On global order: Power, values, and the constitution of international society. Oxford University Press.
Keating, M. (2001). Nations against the state: The new politics of nationalism in Quebec, Catalonia and Scotland (2nd ed.). Palgrave.
Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Cornell University Press.
Korab-Karpowicz, W. J. (2020). The United Citizens Organization: Public-private partnerships in global governance.
Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018920
Krasner, S. D. (1983). International regimes. Cornell University Press.
Krott, M. (2005). Forest policy analysis. Springer Science & Business Media.
Lewis, S. (2020). PISA, policy and the OECD: Respatialising global education governance through PISA for schools. Springer.
Lewis, S., Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2016). PISA for schools: Topological rationality and new spaces of the OECD’s global educational governance. Comparative Education Review, 60(1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/684362
Lingard, B., & Sellar, S. (2016). The changing organizational and global significance of the OECD’s education work. In K. Mundy, A. Green, B. Lingard, & A. Verger (Eds.), The handbook of global education policy (pp. 357–373). John Wiley & Sons.
Long, J., & Huang, H. (2024). Obligations and liabilities concerning the active removal of foreign space debris: A global governance perspective. Acta Astronautica, 222, 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2024.01.013
Mansfeld, E. D. (1995). International institutions and economic sanctions. World Politics, 47(4), 560–575. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950717
McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
McKenzie, M., & Stahelin, N. (2022). The global inter-network governance of UN policy programs on climate change education. International Journal of Educational Research, 116, 102093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102093
McKenzie, M., & Stahelin, N. (in press). The role of meetings in the network governance and mobility of UN policy programs on environment and education. ECNU Review of Education.
Muller, J. (2016). Reclaiming knowledge: Social theory, curriculum and education policy. Routledge.
Ness, G. D., & Brechin, S. R. (1988). Bridging the gap: International organizations as organizations. International Organization, 42(2), 245–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300007226
O’Brien, R., Goetz, A. M., Scholte, J. A., & Williams, M. (2000). Contesting global governance: Multilateral economic institutions and global social movements. Cambridge University Press.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
Pattberg, P., & Stripple, J. (2008). Beyond the public and private divide: Remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4), 367–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-008-9085-3
Pattberg, P., & Widerberg, O. (2015). Theorising global environmental governance: Key findings and future questions. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(2), 684–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829814561773
Pattberg, P., & Zelli, F. (2016). Environmental governance theories: A review. In T. Gabrielson, C. Hall, J. M. Meyer, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental political theory (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press.
Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58(2), 277–309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582036
Ruggie, J. G. (2014). Global governance and “new governance theory”: Lessons from business and human rights. Global Governance, 20(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02001002
Stone, D., & Ladi, S. (2015). Global public policy and transnational administration. Public Administration, 93(4), 839–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12179
Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state: The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge University Press.
Weiss, T. G., & Wilkinson, R. (2014). Rethinking global governance? Complexity, authority, power, change. International Studies Quarterly, 58(1), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12082
Weiss, T. G., & Wilkinson, R. (2018). International organization and global governance (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Young, O. R. (1994). International governance: Protecting the environment in a stateless society. Cornell University Press.
Zelli, F., & van Asselt, H. (2013). Introduction: The institutional fragmentation of global environmental governance: Causes, consequences, and responses. Global Environmental Politics, 13(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00180 | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 165 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 56 |